| To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: FT-1000MP |
| From: | "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> |
| Reply-to: | sawyered@earthlink.net |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:49:02 -0400 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I agree with others on the IPO on 160 - 40 which defeats the "Tuned" preamp. I personally don't default to attenuation of any value. It depends on the noise level and the bandwidth. On CW (which is the most common on 160) and a fairly narrow bandwidth, I often use no attenuation whatsoever with my terminated beverages and have worked many DX stations which would not be heard if 18dB of attenuation were selected. Ed N1UR _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: Spare 160 meter coil for Butternut Verticals, Herbert Schoenbohm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: 160 Meter Three Element Short Vertical Receiving Array, donovanf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: FT-1000MP, Kip Edwards |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: Back Scatter ?, K1FZ-Bruce |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |