Hi Jose,
To keep things simple, I say the K9AY is not like a pennant or flag since
it has been demonstrated by many people to be more ground dependent
(sometimes needing added ground radials). Under certain conditions the
K9AY should be identical to a Flag or Pennant but since ground radials have
been shown to drastically impact the K9AY performance depending on the
ground conditions this sure does not sound like this is always the case.
I won't debate the SAL (Shared Apex Loop), other than to say from a
construction standpoint it's definitely not the same as the K9AY or other
EWE type antenna (Flag, Pennants, etc.), and modeling the SAL definitely
yields a different pattern than a single pennant or flag when used in the
"in line direction" but as you said modeling does not always reflect
reality (your example was EZNEC not doing a good job with loops close to
ground). I have never used an SAL and therefore my statements are only
based on what modeling yields, but to say the SAL is the same as a K9AY is
hard to believe regardless if it performs better or worse than the K9AY,
just based on the design.
P.S. I believe there is a newer version of the SAL in which the two
halves of the SAL share the same center vertical conductor, but again I'm
not making any claims about the design. Also note I'm using 4NEC2 for my
modeling, not that it necessarily impacts my above statements.
73,
Don (wd8dsb)
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 10:27 PM Jose_Carlos <N4IS@comcast.net> wrote:
> Don
>
> I’m afraid your information is not accurate, SAL is the same as a K9AY,
> the two wires close to each other can be removed because they cancel each
> other. The remain wires works like two vertical in phase, as the same in
> any flag, loaded loop or pennant. The cardioid pattern is the same.
>
> The is no implementation of two SAL in phase because it does not work, the
> phasing system is too complex to phase two SAL.
>
> If you know the people that actually tested the antenna, you know that the
> claimed RDF was never achieved.
>
> The RDF of the K9AY is the same of the SAL, the EZENEC does a horrible job
> with loops close to the ground.
>
> Saying that, both antennas are excellent receiver antennas if you don’t
> have anything else.
>
> 73’s
> JC
> N4IS
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows
>
> From: Don Kirk
> Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 7:19 PM
> To: W0MU Mike Fatchett
> Cc: topband
> Subject: Re: Topband: K9AY Loop Questions
>
> Hi Mike and gang,
>
> It has been a long time since I looked at the SAL in which I modeled it
> with the help of the designer of the SAL (KB7GF). The SAL is actually
> different than the K9AY and other EWE types of RX antennas which have a
> typical RDF value of around 7.8 because the SAL (Shared Apex Loop) antenna
> actively uses two of its loops which are "in line" with each other for what
> you might call the primary direction (direction in line with the loops),
> and these two phased loops can provide an RDF value of around 9.2 depending
> on the coupler locations. For the off axis directions (45 degrees to the
> loops) I believe all 4 loops of the SAL are active (phased together) and
> they provide a pattern more like what you would expect from the K9AY or
> other EWEs with an RDF of approximately 7.8. Therefore in the 4 primary
> directions of the SAL the SAL definitely has a better RDF than the K9AY or
> other types of EWE receiving antennas.
>
> When used "in line" the RDF of the SAL is around 9.2 as mentioned above
> which is similar to what you would obtain using two phased verticals with
> 1/8 wavelength spacing.
>
> Just FYI,
> Don (wd8dsb)
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:43 PM W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote:
>
> > The SAL is pretty much just an AY loop with a more functional
> > controller? I have had moderate success with a pennant at V31 as well.
> >
> > W0MU
> >
> > On 1/5/2022 7:23 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
> > > I tried an AY loop decades ago, without the Array Solutions adjustable
> > > termination controller, and I do not remember it being that useful for
> > RX.
> > > The antenna is ground dependant so perhaps it works better for some
> than
> > > others. Even a short Beverage may be a better choice. From my P40A
> > station I
> > > used a Pennant with decent results. It was inexpensive to build and not
> > > ground dependant however it only covered one direction. The Array
> > Solutions
> > > Shared Apex Loop Array has great reviews and may be worth considering,
> > Pete.
> > >
> > > John KK9A
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
> > >
> > > I recently installed a K9AY loop (with the Array Solutions controller),
> > > and have a couple of questions. Installation is pretty standard, with
> a
> > > fiberglass pole at the center, ground rod at its base, and on the
> ground
> > > radials under each direction of the loop.
> > >
> > > The antenna is directional, as demonstrated by tuning in broadcast
> > > stations at the high end of the AM band and separating stations on the
> > > same frequency so that I can hear one or the other. Atmospheric noise
> > > is 1-2 S units more on my inverted L than on the K9AY antenna, but
> > > signal strengths of stations in the favored direction of the loop seem
> > > about the same or a bit lower than the inverted L. The Termination
> > > adjustment is working, to judge by the switching transients, but seems
> > > to make little or no difference.
> > >
> > > How do these results compare with others' experience? I didn't expect
> a
> > > "magic bullet", but the K9AY loop seems a little bit underwhelming.
> > >
> > _________________
> > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> > Reflector
> >
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|