To: | "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>,"towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 |
From: | "Malcolm Ringel" <mringel@bluecrab.org> |
Date: | Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:02:44 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Al: Not an expert by any means, but, having had (and still have one) a
couple of crank-up tilt-overs (and never a problem ...even though never
cranked down for storms, etc) I think it has , at least in large part, to do
with weight distribution. The nesting aspect of the sections calls for
largest at the base and smaller as you ascend...also, there is usually a
several foot overlap at the section junctions, making for greater strength
at those points. Finally, I believe that c-u/t-o towers usually have more
concrete in their larger base cavities. I await the sting of the arrows of those who actually can explain it....H I 73 Malcolm Ringel ARS K3KZ St. Michaels, MD _______________________________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk To: "towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25
_______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical Automatic Tilt Over, Jim Lux |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25, Jim Lux |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25, Al Williams |
Next by Thread: | RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25, Hank Lonberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |