Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160 invertde L

To: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>,"Towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160 invertde L
From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:51:02 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
> Without all the meter readings etc, if I did have a SWR of
3:1 with a 50 ohm
> cable, that would mean the impedance at the feedpoint
could be 16.6 ohms or
> it would be 150 ohms.  I can't figure why it would be
clear down to 16.6 as
> I know the radials are in good shape.  I trimmed all the
ends and
> re-soldered them so they would be fresh.  Would the
presence of the 80 meter
> dipole about 6-8 feet away from the point where the
antenna goes from
> horizontal to vertical mess it up that bad.

An 80m dipole antenna near the inverted L can drastically
affect SWR. Many low 80m dipoles combined with the feedline
act like a T antenna and resonate on 160.

Also, as a general rule the better the radial system (as a
general rule, do not take this as an "always" rule) the
lower the antenna feed impedance. It might easily be 15-20
ohms feed impedance.

73 Tom

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>