Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of the HAM Series ofrotators...How doyoutell th

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of the HAM Series ofrotators...How doyoutell the difference.
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:15:04 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 > Almost certainly not a T2X. Wrong wiring for one although it could
 > be a really old one without the pigtail.

T2X uses same wiring as HAM II/III/IV/V.  The difference is a
larger casting (with through bolts) and a third bearing race.

The only difference in the controllers between T2X and HAM IV/V
is the additional LEDs for CW/CCW (and possibly paint color
depending on the era).  Compare parts lists in the manuals at
various stages of production and you will find part numbers
leapfrogging one another as improvements were introduced in
first one then the other series of rotors.

... and yes, the original T2X included the terminal strips ...
I have two of them with terminal strips from the late 70's.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 10/26/2010 5:29 PM, Roger (K8RI) wrote:
>
>
> On 10/26/2010 4:53 PM, n8de@thepoint.net wrote:
>> Roger,
>> One thing you might try is this:
>>
>> connect the rotor to a control box, and then push the 'brake' lever.
>>
>> Listen closely to the 'noise' it makes.
>>
>> If the sound appears to come from the BOTTOM of the lower housing, it
>> may be a HAM-M or similar family.
>
> Already been there<:-)) It's from the side.
>
>> If the sound appears to come from the SIDE of the lower housing, it
>> might be a HAM-III, HAM-IV, or T2X, but I'm sure all the T2X rotor
>> housings have definite markings you can't confuse with the others.
>>
> Almost certainly not a T2X. Wrong wiring for one although it could be a
> really old one without the pigtail. I don't know if they made
> TailTwisters without the pigtail.
> This is sorta like working on a fairly simple circuit without a
> schematic although I don't see any problem putting this back together
> without a diagram or photo. The only tricky part is the double bearing
> race with the one set of bearings setting directly on top of the other.
> It takes some good grease to keep them in place.
>
> The last time I had one of these apart was not long after they came out
> with the latest and greatest ...Ham M.<:-))
>> NOW ... if you'd like to dispose of any of them,  I'M INTERESTED!!
> Sorry, they really aren't mine. I said I inherited them, but when I said
> I needed a rotator I was offered one "to use" that might need a bit of
> work as it had set around a long time. The wording was I could store it
> on my tower for him. (He doesn't foresee needing it for a longgg time).
> This way, when I no longer need it he can have it back albeit the thing
> now looks like new, inside and out and it was a reasonable way for me to
> get a rotator to use for a while.
>
> I have to admit this has reminded me why I really like the PST61 and
> Alpha Spid, Dual worm gear rotators.<:-))
>
> 73
>
> Roger (K8RI)
>> 73,
>> Don
>> N8DE
>>
>>
>> Quoting "Roger (K8RI)"<K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>:
>>
>>>
>>> On 10/26/2010 4:18 PM, Roger (K8RI) wrote:
>>>> On 10/26/2010 5:34 AM, Todd Coulter wrote:
>>>>> Roger,
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe this page from Norm's Rotor Service will help.
>>>> A little, but I already know it's a ham series due to the extended brake
>>>> housing that adds about 4" to the height.
>>>>
>>>> What I can't find are any designations stamped on the base of the
>>>> housing. I'm assuming that means the bottom outside of the base?  There
>>>> is no mast extension to cover the base. There is a single digit followed
>>>> by a dash and IIRC 3 digits,
>>> Those numbers are 5 604 (space between the 5 and 604) and are the only
>>> thing on the base.There is nothing on the outside of the base cover
>>> which is the brake and nothing on the bell.
>>>
>>> It appears to be a Ham IV, but could be a older Ham M and I do not know
>>> how to tell them apart based on appearance and parts.
>>>
>>> 73
>>>
>>> Roger (K8RI)
>>>> but nothing that resembles the codes
>>>> depicted on norms page which BTW if you wear bifocals is very difficult
>>>> to read with the text overlaying the charts.
>>>>
>>>> Even then, there is nothing to tell me what's different between the
>>>> different models even if I do find a designation which seems to be
>>>> missing. The controller is just the generic "ham" controller.
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>>
>>>> Roger (K8RI)
>>>>> http://rotorservice.com/serv3%20identify.htm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 73's
>>>>> Todd
>>>>> N4JRZ
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
>>>>> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Roger (K8RI)
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 2:07 AM
>>>>> To: TOWERTALK@contesting.com
>>>>> Subject: [TowerTalk] Speaking of the Han Series of rotators...How do you
>>>>> tell the difference.
>>>>>
>>>>> I recently inherited a couple of basket cases. They appear to be ham
>>>>> IV's but how do you tell the ham IV rotator minus control box,  from the
>>>>> other models?  Other than having to clean out a lot of dirt and replace
>>>>> the bearings...I replaced the terminal strips with the TailTwister
>>>>> pigtails and connectors. Welll... I really didn't have to replace the
>>>>> bearings, but I like shiny bearings rather than old dull black ones.
>>>>> That and I discovered you can purchase them from Hy-gain including the
>>>>> retainers for between 1/3 and 1/4 the price at the hardware store which
>>>>> used to be an inexpensive place to get things like that.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73
>>>>>
>>>>> Roger (K8RI)
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>>> Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3219 - Release Date: 10/25/10
>>>>> 14:34:00
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>