Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 80 Meter trap design needed

To: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>, "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 80 Meter trap design needed
From: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Reply-to: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 01:32:13 +0000
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
my recent 80M trap experience.....my previous 160m ant was an inverted L suspended off a hazer on my Rohn 25 tower.....when higher winds or storms I cranked the hazer down, so was out of business on 160M......been looking for an alternative, and one of my other antennas is a Hygain Hytower.....most of what I heard about the 160M kit for the Hytower wasnt good......I just so happened to have a W2AU 80M trap with the ability to mount via tubing......so.....bright idea, I would replace the stinger on my Hytower with different size tubing, allowing me to mount the trap on top of the hytower, and attach a loading wire to it.....I had most of the tubing I needed, ordered what few pieces I needed....I built the new stinger to the length of the old one (probably my first mistake), attached the trap, and about 47 ft of wire (per the instructions from Unadilla for a wire antenna)......tilted the tower back up, swr was a little higher than before on 80M, but was less than 1.5:1 at 1820 so I left it.......worked a few stations on 160, worked a few on 80, everything seemed good......until........until I tried to work S9OK on 160M.....with the amp.....at about 1400 watts.....calling for about an hour and them something went south in a hurry.....swr all over the place on 160 and 80.....I havent had the chance to tilt it back over but I suspect the trap overheated.......another bright idea that wasnt so bright after all.....

------ Original Message ------
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Sent: 10/23/2021 2:54:20 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 80 Meter trap design needed

On 10/23/2021 4:56 AM, Mark - N5OT wrote:
I hope to make a trap vertical that works on 80 and 160.

First question is, why a trap? If it's not height, consider a fan.

Second, there's a design for 2-band 2nd harmonic dipoles where there's a 
loading coil (NOT a trap) near what would be the quarter-wave point of the 
lower frequency band, with a relatively short wire beyond it. That design has 
relatively narrow SWR bandwidth on the lower frequency band, but bandwidth 
comparable to dipole on the higher band.

This design works quite well, and there have been several successful commercial 
implementations of it. Hypower Antenna Company (tiny ad in QST) sells them, and 
may sell the loading coils separately. I measured their coils for the 160/80 
and 80/40 designs many years ago, and can probably find the data. But it's a 
fairly easy design to do in NEC, and I recently did one for a 40/20 dipole made 
from Al tubing for use on CQP county expeditions.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>