VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] VHF Rules Revisions - Part VI

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] VHF Rules Revisions - Part VI
From: AA4ZZ@aol.com (AA4ZZ@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:50 2003
In a message dated 5/7/03 8:38:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
kkaufhold@yahoo.com writes:

> Conclusion.  I feel that we should not be fooling
>  around with the contest rules merely on hope that the
>  number of log entries may increase as a result.  It is
>  a hope that is not borne out by a historical review of
>  the VHF contests. 

Actually this statement is incorrect. There is a clear correlation between 
the start of the rover catagory and a period of increasing activity. There is 
a similar correlation with the begining of the current decline in activity 
and the revision of the rover scoring method.
73 Paul AA4ZZ
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>