VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] SPLAT!

To: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] SPLAT!
From: James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:46:27 -0600
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Marshall - The coverage maps should show you path loss in a number  
that is in dB. What is the path loss at the outer edge of the 50 mile  
circle?

I found the coverage circle to be a bit short here as well, it cut off  
well before my stations capabilities gave out on some calculations I  
made. I found the station to station calculations to be more  
informative, so try one of those calculations with a distant station  
you can work regularly.

The path loss is a characteristic of the path terrain, climate,  
distance, and the scattering medium. It is independent of the station  
capability.

Once you have the path loss, you need to calculate the path loss  
capability of your station. Here is a short explanation on how to do  
this. It helps to read the November 1983 QST article "Tropospheric  
Scatter Propagation" by G3YGF. That is also reprinted in the ARRL  
publication "Beyond Line of Sight"

The path loss capability, plc, is given by

plc = eirp + ers

where eirp is the effective radiated power of the transmitting station  
in decibels above 1 watt referred to an isotropic radiating source,  
and ers is the effective receiver sensitivity of the receiving station.

SPLAT! calculates the Path Loss, pl, for the link being attempted. Or  
you can get a rough idea from the plots in the Antenna Handbook or old  
VHF Handbook.

The signal to noise ratio, snr, expected for the path can be calculated:

snr = plc - pl

The effective radiated power is given by:

eirp = (10*log(P)) + Gtrans - transTL

where P is the transmnitter power in Watts, Gtrans is the transmitting  
antenna gain in dBi (decibels over
an isotropic radiator), and transTL is the transmitter stations  
transmission loss in dB.

The effective receiver sensitivity is given by:

ers = -10*log(k*T*B) + Grecv - recvTL - threshold

the first term is the receiver noise floor where k is Boltzmann's  
constant,

k= 1.38*10^-23

T is the effective receiver noise temperature in degrees Kelvin  
(absolute temperature), which can be calculated from the more commonly  
available noise figure, nf, by:

T = ((10^(nf/10))-1)*290

If you know the receiving noise figure, plug it in, for most  
mainstream multi-mode VHF rigs using 5 dB will get you close.

B is the receiver bandwidth in Hz. 2500 Hz is a typical bandwidth for  
SSB, 500 Hz is a good bandwidth to use for CW.

Grecv is the receiving stations antenna gain in dBi

recvTL is the receiving stations transmission line loss in dB and  
Threshold is the detector threshold for the mode being used. For CW  
and SSB it is 0, while for FM it is 10dB depending on the modulation  
index.

If you don't know what the guy on the other end is using, you need to  
make some assumptions as to these numbers, but 4 or 5 dB noise figure,  
13 to 15 dBi for antenna gain and 1 dB feed line loss are reasonable  
assumptions for a moderately serious VHF station.

I hope I haven't made any mistakes. I am sure that someone will  
correct me if I did. :^)=

 From the above calculations, it is easy to see why CW at narrow  
bandwidth outperforms SSB and why SSB far out performs FM.

I have had SPLAT! give some unrealistic terrain maps from time to  
time. Bll knows about this and is looking into what the problem is. It  
doesn't seem to affect the path loss plots though, or the path loss  
calculated, or the table of terrain data.

Holler if you have any more questions. Once you understand what is  
going on you will find SPLAT! to be a valuable tool. - Duffey
--
KK6MC
James Duffey
Cedar Crest NM





_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>