| To: | vhfcontesting@contesting.com, chris@n9yh.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules |
| From: | John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 May 2009 06:37:47 -0700 (PDT) |
| List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
--- On Wed, 5/27/09, Christopher Burke <burke166@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also 222, 902, and
> 1.2 GHz are all equally within the range of the beginning
> rover using out of
> the box equipment - one might argue that 1.2 Ghz is
> actually, in fact,
> easiest since you can get an all-mode without using a
> transverter while on
> 902 and 222 you're limited to FM only without
> transverters.
Not if the VHF newcomber buys a used FT736R with the 6m and 222 modules
installed in it. Had an identical setup myself once.
73s John AA5JG
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules, Bill Olson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules, John Geiger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules, Christopher Burke |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules, Keith Morehouse |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |