To: | VHFcontesting@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Rules question (not anything to do with the usual problems) |
From: | Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com> |
Date: | Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:47:19 -0700 |
List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
On 1/28/2010 3:41 PM, Ray J wrote: > > Are rovers themselves considered multi-op stations under this rule? There > is a soapbox entry that discusses using APRS info to find rovers but I was > under the impression that only the two multi-op categories could use that > data. However, when I thought about it, I realized that Rovers are allowed > 2 operators and perhaps that is what is meant under the rule. I would > appreciate any input on this. I may have to rethink my position on APRS. > > Only Multi-Op fixed stations and UNLIMITED Rovers are supposed to be able to use "spotting networks". Nate WY0X _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Rules question (not anything to do with the usual problems), Keith Morehouse |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Oops... nevermind, Nate Duehr |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Rules question (not anything to do with the usual problems), Keith Morehouse |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Rules question (not anything to do with the usual problems), Ray J |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |