WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[WriteLog] Paddle Input Capability?

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: [WriteLog] Paddle Input Capability?
From: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM)
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 18:17:33 -0000
Any disadvantages ?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Kurszewski Chad-WCK005 <Chad.Kurszewski@motorola.com>
To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Sent: March 09, 2000 5:14 PM
Subject: [WriteLog] Paddle Input Capability?


> 
> Not to step on the toes of the W5XD Multi Keyer, but would
> it be too much to ask to add a paddle input to the LPT port?
> 
> For those of you who may not have heard of this, there are other
> programs out there where you can connect your paddles directly
> to your LPT port.  WL would act as your keyer.  You simply
> connect your DIT to pin 12, DAH to pin 13 and paddle common
> to pin 25.  The benefits from this are several:
> 
> 1)  Don't need an external keyer.  Handy if your rig doesn't
>     have an "ELEC-KEY" jack in addition to your KEY jack.  This
>     applies to FT-1000 and FT-1000MP users, as well as many other
>     radios, I'm sure.
> 2)  Would be automatically switched to Left/Right radios.
> 3)  Sending from paddle interrupts the message being sent from
>     an F-key.  Your paddle CW collides with the computer-generated
>     CW if you use an external keyer, or your rig's ELEC-KEY.
> 4)  Paddle speed always matches your computer speed.  A option
>     could be added to always send on the paddles with a different
>     speed, say, slower.
> 5)  Cost:  FREE!  (As they say in the business, software is
>     always "free".  To those of you not in the business, that
>     actually means, "to add that feature is free".  I'm in no
>     way advocating piracy.)
> 6)  Is great for those of us who still like to occasionally
>     send manually, instead of "keyboard CW".
> 7)  Doesn't interfere with other LPT pin assignments.  (With
>     the exception of the A/B pin.  Pin 14 is typically used
>     to pull-up the two paddle input pins.  One could use an
>     external pull-up and still have A/B function.  From what
>     I've seen in this forum, there are VERY few users of the
>     A/B function.)
> 
> Is there enough interest out there from everyone to convince
> Wayne to add this great feature??  Whattaya say?
> 
> Chad  WE9V
> 
> --
> WWW:                      http://www.contesting.com/writelog
> Submissions:              writelog@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-writelog@contesting.com
> 


--
WWW:                      http://www.contesting.com/writelog
Submissions:              writelog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-writelog@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>