As a counter point, there were many times during the wpx when all that
decoded correctly was the ? When I saw a ? amongst the garbage, I just sent
a repeat automatically. Otherwise I sit there waiting for the other station
to repeat, or I transmit an "again" on top of his qso.
I look at the net time to make a valid qso. Sometimes a few extra
characters sent once is more effective that a bunch of repeats. But then
maybe that's why I am not at the top to the lists??? HI
Jerry, W6IHG
At 06:30 PM 2/17/2004 -0800, Bill Turner wrote:
_________________________________________________________
I think Jerry's got a good point. About halfway through the recent WPX
I changed my NR? NR? NR? macro to NR NR NR and it seemed to work just as
well and was much faster.
------------------------------------------
Dr. Jerry R. Pixton, PIXOS Designs LLC
http://www.pixos.com/designs/RadioTuner/
jpixton@shentel.net
------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|