On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:22:30 +0000, Jerry Pixton wrote:
>As a counter point, there were many times during the wpx when all that
>decoded correctly was the ? When I saw a ? amongst the garbage, I just sent
>a repeat automatically. Otherwise I sit there waiting for the other station
>to repeat, or I transmit an "again" on top of his qso.
_________________________________________________________
We're getting down to some really fine points here, but hey, that's half
the fun. The only objection I would have to sending ? is that it
requires a FIGS shift character, whereas NR doesn't.
That said, it really doesn't make that much difference. Try it both
ways and see what works best. And then try it a third way. That's how
we learn things, or at least how I do. :-)
--
73, Bill W6WRT
QSLs via LoTW
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|