Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bcarling@cfl.rr.com: 219 ]

Total 219 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI mystery (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:52:53 -0400
With most transceivers, if you make sure that the signal you are receiving is Tuned exactly to your side tone pitch then you will be on the same frequency as them. This is the case with my Omni 6+. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00600.html (10,720 bytes)

122. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI mystery (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:05:04 -0400
If someone is really uncertain what frequency they are on, then there are several ways of measuring. Send CQ in CW for example. There are reversed beacon networks and various other tools on the Inter
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00601.html (11,622 bytes)

123. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 10:53:21 -0500
I need to open up my OMNI 6 Plus and have a good look at a coupe of things: 1) The filter in the N-1 position is NOT at all good. It dramatically INCREASES the QRM in a contest whether using SSB or C
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00002.html (11,697 bytes)

124. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 12:01:10 -0500
Many thanks Bob. I'm going to try to get this done over the weekend. Best regards - Bry Carling
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00005.html (15,382 bytes)

125. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 15:18:24 -0500
Ed you must be talking about those XE stations tuning up on SSB on the low end of 40m. They groan "hoooooo-la" while they dip the plate control ! SOP Best regards - Bry Carling
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00006.html (11,206 bytes)

126. Re: [TenTec] Re(Ten Tec) In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 12:40:55 -0500
My 422 Centurion manual has very adequate instructions for tuning, and that is what I go by. Best regards - Bry Carling
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00023.html (9,214 bytes)

127. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 08:35:21 -0500
Ig not exceeding max specs. And yes of course Rick - that is precisely why we dip Ip first before everything else, and always watch for not exceeding maximum plate current rating as well as maximum I
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00036.html (15,889 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:52:01 -0500
Some rigs yes. Some rigs no. It doesn't necessarily follow that something is wrong with the equipment. If you want an example, try looking at a Drake manual. Best regards - Bry Carling
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00040.html (18,785 bytes)

129. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 07:13:37 -0500
Rick - make sure you use an ink that can be removed. The next owner may not want that, and you may get less for the amplifier when reselling it.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00052.html (10,000 bytes)

130. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:05:20 -0500
So YOU'RE THAT GUY! (grin!)
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00055.html (12,648 bytes)

131. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amp QSK Board (score: 1)
Author: <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 22:48:02 -0400
Interesting developments. I have a newly rewound HV power transformer installed in my Tentec 422. It appears to be working. No more blowing primary fuses and I now see the 3000V or so that I expect o
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00136.html (11,202 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amp QSK Board (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:59:51 -0400
Thanks Don - I will call them tomorrow and buy the kit. Or find those 5 parts on the web. This QSK board was already replaced once by the previous owner. It seems to be the other one of two very weak
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00141.html (14,218 bytes)

133. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amp QSK Board (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:13:27 -0400
By the way - I have heard of 7 or 8 of these Centurion HV transformers blowing in recent years and then being rewound. I can imagine that there have been quite a few of the transformers replaced by T
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00142.html (14,158 bytes)

134. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amp QSK Board (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 22:36:26 -0400
Yes and the good news is my Centurion is up and running after I replaced the two chips on the QSK board today. However the fan still won't run so I need to fix that before using it any more. I always
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00148.html (10,040 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amp QSK Board (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:48:15 -0400
Thanks Bob - my 422 cebnturion is all fixed and working 100% now. First I installed the newly rewound plate transformer from Gary Brown of TRS. Thanks so much Gary, for the wonderful top-quality rewi
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00156.html (13,190 bytes)

136. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:50:03 -0400
Kim I can think of many reasons. The used amp I bought with relays was a lot cheaper to acquire than a new amp with pin diodes. Even with reopairing it I saved money. Does Ten Tec use PIN diodes in t
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00157.html (8,865 bytes)

137. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:55:52 -0400
Ver yinteresting gary... I have to wonder why some guys will spend $500 for an external accessory to do QSK with their linear amplifier. The system in my TT 422 is so simple. A couple of simple board
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00177.html (14,037 bytes)

138. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:03:24 -0400
Yes, but I think a lot of radio amateurs using good QSK Rigs like the Tentec have managed to convert their amplifiers for QSK operation by adding a circuitboard like the QSK 1500 or the QSK5. I reali
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00179.html (11,932 bytes)

139. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:29:12 -0400
Thank you Rick. I enjoy QSK whatever the background noise is not too high. I frequently have a noise level of about S7 on 80 m and 40m here in Florida. That does not make for a great situation unless
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00181.html (15,232 bytes)

140. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:12:04 -0400
Rick - I would say that the 813 is also a great valve. You used to be able to buy them for $20.- 30 each not too long ago, but because they are out of production ver few manufacturers still want to u
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00189.html (22,913 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu