Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve@oakcom.com: 185 ]

Total 185 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TowerTalk] Screw Anchor Question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:58:26 -0500
My limited understanding indicates that the highest current (and therefore the worst corrosion) flows between the steel anchors and the copper ground system, assuming a reasonable electrolyte (earth)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00404.html (9,840 bytes)

162. Re: [TowerTalk] measuring cable loss with an MFJ 259B (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:16:52 -0400
Pete, When sweeping feedlines at cell sites, we use (max+min)/2 (over the frequency range of interest) for cable loss (cable terminated in a precision short). This gives a number that is somewhat (20
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00267.html (8,491 bytes)

163. Re: [TowerTalk] Andrew L7PNM-HH connectors on 1-5/8" Cablewave? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 23:23:33 -0400
I've never had occasion to use a male connector on 1-5/8" - I assume you're doing that because that's what you happen to have? But I've used L7PNF and L7PDF connectors on RFS cable in a pinch, and th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00681.html (7,833 bytes)

164. Re: [TowerTalk] 1100 foot tower for a buck (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:29:45 -0400
Is that the price for each tower, or for all of them? Steve K8LX _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@conte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00046.html (8,086 bytes)

165. Re: [TowerTalk] Ooops! Wrong guy bracketassembly installed--nowwhat?! (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:02:35 -0400
Rest assured though that shackles ARE a fairly common component of engineered guy wire systems. On permanent installs the bolt and nut pin type is preferred, but the screw-pin type is fine as well. T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00992.html (8,350 bytes)

166. Re: [TowerTalk] coax seal (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:47:40 -0500
Jim, Like you, I can tape up a connection with 33 that is positively hermetically sealed. Many folks can't seem to however, and that is one reason why, in the commercial world, the standard has devel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00469.html (8,715 bytes)

167. Re: [TowerTalk] Tram rope (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:29:50 -0500
The advantages of good 1/2" double braid rope for a tram line: 1) Plenty strong - 10,000 lb breaking strength, 2400 lb. working load. 2) Has a *small* amount of stretch available, which acts to lesse
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00684.html (8,216 bytes)

168. Re: [TowerTalk] Tram rope (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:33:31 -0500
This all depends on what rope you use, and what you are using to tension the tram. If you have a stretchy piece of nylon and a ratchet puller with 6' of pull, yes, it's a problem. If you have a good
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00746.html (7,942 bytes)

169. Re: [TowerTalk] Radio Frequency Systems Cable (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:19:55 -0500
Craig, UCF-114 is corrugated copper hardline. RFS calls it "Ultraflex" cable, but being 1-1/4" diameter, it's not really very flexible. UCF is similar to Andrew VXL cable. It's not what you want for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00768.html (7,912 bytes)

170. Re: [TowerTalk] Phillystran Guy Design (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:13:05 -0500
It's supposedly happened on some larger commercial towers, but I'm not sure where. On my Philly guyed ham towers I carefully tape the ends (forming a cone) with good ole Scotch 33, which seems like i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00815.html (9,446 bytes)

171. Re: [TowerTalk] Measuring coax loss with MFJ-259B (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:50:36 -0400
Pete, This is perfectly normal behavior - I sweep feedlines on a regular basis with Anritsu Sitemasters, and usually use (highest peak + lowest valley)/2 as my cable loss value. A short (instead of a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00144.html (9,783 bytes)

172. [TowerTalk] feedline sweeptests (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:08:32 -0400
Just in case anyone is interested in what a typical set of sweeps, from a typical PCS feedline looks like, I uploaded a pdf file to: http://www.box.net/public/tedic3zmd0 This feedline happened to be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00156.html (7,020 bytes)

173. Re: [TowerTalk] Looking For LMR-400UF (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:07:12 -0400
Dick, I just purchased a 500' reel from Tessco for $433, which beats most other sources on price. I use it for rotator loops - otherwise, regular LMR-400 clones (as low as $.33/ft) would make more ce
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00860.html (7,350 bytes)

174. Re: [TowerTalk] Looking For LMR-400UF (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:26:00 -0400
Yes, I've got 7/8" Heliax going up the towers, and LMR-400UF from there to the antenna feedpoints. LMR-400UF *Superflex* is probably similar to what you use - it's got a stranded center conductor and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00864.html (7,934 bytes)

175. Re: [TowerTalk] Takeoff Angles and Non-Reciprocal Propagation (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:58:32 -0400
Dave, It seems to me that when you model station B (located at ground level and fairly close to the hill) coming back at you, you are not producing diffraction info that's relevant to a skywave comin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00070.html (10,019 bytes)

176. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR400-UF Crimp Connector ?? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:27:29 -0500
RFC-1703-T Steve K8LX _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00519.html (7,229 bytes)

177. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR400-UF Crimp Connector ?? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:43:00 -0500
My source for the RFC-1703-T has been RF Connection, and it's still on Joel's web site. It sounds like an RFI part number, but may not be. I can verify though that it is sized correctly for LMR-400 &
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00523.html (7,995 bytes)

178. Re: [TowerTalk] Star guying (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:07:13 -0500
It's not uncommon to use a smaller guy when doubled, and therefore a smaller amount of initial pre-tension. However, rarely do you see pre-tension on a given strand to be way less than 10% of rated b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00024.html (7,554 bytes)

179. Re: [TowerTalk] W3LPL coax attenuation chart (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:17:40 -0500
Steve, Here's a spreadsheet I created a few years ago that let's you plug in any length (in feet) and it will calculate the corresponding loss for the various cable types (including LMR) and frequenc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00399.html (7,812 bytes)

180. Re: [TowerTalk] CCR's -- Am I being too paranoid? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:05:05 -0400
IMO, this is the most important advice there is. If there are no complaints from close neighbors, you rarely have a problem. My neighbors actually showed up en masse in my defense at a zoning hearing
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00395.html (9,066 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu