Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:btippett@alum.mit.edu: 1159 ]

Total 1159 documents matching your query.

81. Topband: VK9ML band planning (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 19:48:10 +0000
"I'm sharing this chart with you so that each of you knows what we are up against on the reef. North American 160m operators may want to focus on working us BEFORE 1100z if propagation permits. And i
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00199.html (7,550 bytes)

82. Topband: Re: MFJ power line noise receiver or alternatives? (score: 1)
Author: k3ky@erols.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>)
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 10:30:22 +0000
Very good, BillGetting the police involved was a stroke of genius. You might have a promising career awaiting in politics. :o) That must have been a heck of an arc to wipe out VHF. Here in the MD sub
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00221.html (9,334 bytes)

83. Topband: [ The Daily DX ] XR0X - San Felix update (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 23:30:42 +0000
Following excerpts from The Daily DX: 73, Bill W4ZV
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00233.html (6,930 bytes)

84. Topband: VP6DI QRT on 160 (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 03:43:56 +0000
We (AF2C and I) spoke with the crew on 15 meter phone at 0200, and this is the final update. They will be packing beginning at daybreak 26 March Ducie time, but will be working 15, 20 and 75 meter P
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00243.html (6,507 bytes)

85. Topband: Kp = 5 just in time for CQ WPX?! :-( (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 23:21:32 +0000
http://www.spacew.com/aurora/forumnotes.html A mild (fairly slow velocity) interplanetary shock was observed passing the ACE spacecraft near 21:42 UTC (4:42 pm EST) on 29 March. The source is not cle
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00257.html (7,591 bytes)

86. Topband: RM-10352 Deadline Tomorrow (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 12:31:37 +0000
Topband Friends! We are entering the home stretch for our rulemaking petiton to restrict wideband modes on 160 to 1843 kHz and above. Tomorrow is the final deadline for making comment and we hope tha
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00009.html (10,235 bytes)

87. Topband: Opposition Statements to RM-10352 (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 19:33:08 +0000
Several of you have asked for arguments from the opposition. The following identical comment was posted 7 times thus far today by: Luis Cruz, N4LDG Juan Arencibia, KD4ZDV Julio Perez, KD4FPP Julio Ri
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00011.html (10,848 bytes)

88. Topband: Re: Noise and reception (score: 1)
Author: k3ky@erols.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 02:57:14 +0000
Hi, RickI need to dig my Sep 95 QST out of storage and reread the two articles about the K6STI horizontal loop- but I do remember the author saying that the antenna will work just about as well at 5
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00122.html (8,625 bytes)

89. Topband: Re: Signal on 1952.250 (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:30:21 +0000
K4KYV: Most radiolocation services are now at VHF/UHF. GPS is also expected to eventually replace radiolocation for new applications. In a March 1995 report on spectrum trends, NTIA said about radiol
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00131.html (7,719 bytes)

90. Topband: JT1CO Paths (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:21:08 +0000
My guess is that the next few weeks will offer the best chance for sunrise long path to Chak JT1CO. I looked back over my previous long path QSO's and found the following data. Common darkness refers
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00132.html (8,336 bytes)

91. Topband: JT1CO Paths (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:43:32 +0000
QSO Date UTC Com Dark QSO @ % Sunset path: JT1CO - W4ZV 22FEB02 2327 35 50 JT1CO - W4ZV 01MAR02 2326 0 nil Oops, too early and I goofed...change the above to: Sunset path: JT1CO - W4ZV 22FEB02 2327 3
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00134.html (7,005 bytes)

92. Topband: 160m band plan (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 19:10:38 +0000
Bingo! This is what K1ZM and I have been trying to say to those who think there is not a problem with USA stations continuously CQ-ing below 1843. It may take awhile for EU stations to adjust to list
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00145.html (9,505 bytes)

93. Topband: Conditions on 160m last night (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 23:47:56 +0000
Things must have really changed since I left Colorado in 1993 Milt. Back then there was no way I could have ever heard any DX from EU in the 160 SSB contest unless it was in the 30-35 window...which
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00154.html (8,755 bytes)

94. Topband: (the bandplan is working) Conditions on 160m lastnight (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 12:00:30 +0000
Here's a little data to support Ted's point: S53R 1810.0 YA5T qsx up for eu/ja...pse no ssb 2058 23 Feb 2002 OM5RW 1810.0 YA5T op 1.5 finnaly sri for qrm YA2124 23 Feb 2002 JA4DEN 1810.1 YA5T CQ JA C
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00161.html (9,442 bytes)

95. Topband: (the bandplan is working) Conditions on 160m lastnight (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:10:50 +0000
Tony, CQ's recommended DX window for BOTH the CW and SSB contests is 1830-35. If USA SSB stations honored the bandplan, 1800-1843 would effectively become the SSB DX window for any DX stations that c
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00168.html (8,202 bytes)

96. Topband: Re: 160 band plan (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:47:32 +0000
Barry and all, this is a repeat of a post made January 24 by Bob VE3KZ. 73, Bill W4ZV http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/topband/2002-January/014132.html Gentlemen Just a little view from North of
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00182.html (8,177 bytes)

97. Topband: 160m band plan (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 00:04:33 +0000
Right on Bill! I would add that RM-10352 is petitioning the FCC to restrict ONLY wideband modes to 1843 and above. Wideband modes are AM, SSB, SSTV and any technique that consumes bandwidth which inc
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00186.html (8,945 bytes)

98. SV: Topband: 160m band plan (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:41:05 +0000
complaining of? Are they included in you 1Khz bandwith. If we should go for a bandplan it should include cw also. Ken, we should always be operating using properly adjusted equipment...CW and SSB. On
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00198.html (7,611 bytes)

99. Topband: Confessions of A Known Criminal (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:31:33 +0000
Perhaps a "Gentlemen's Band" and a band which allows contests are not compatible - except for the SP test, a contest is a contest - mostly rude and inconsiderate activity and there is nothing unique
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00202.html (7,050 bytes)

100. Topband: Re: 1843 (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 14:45:57 +0000
This was clarified in a reply comment to the FCC: Mr. Critchell is correct in his assessment. As members of the ARRL 160 Bandplan Committee, we discussed the problem of some amateurs not understandin
/archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00224.html (7,714 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu