Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Cabrillo (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:33:24 -0500
Hello, I am on the committee that is putting the Colombian Independence Day Contest on track again. Next year is the bicentennial of the Independence of Colombia and the LCRA is interested in knowing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00413.html (7,985 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Watch those dits (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:59:08 -0500
Tell me about it... 5K0CW heard as HK0CW and 5K3CA as HK3CA....even though we made a ponit of sending 5 dits..instead of 4... 73 de 5K3CW oops ..sorry HK3CW... Rob ___________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00510.html (8,259 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] predict who will win (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:23:17 -0500
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00065.html (8,987 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:47:57 -0500
So who were R36F? Did they have an unfair advantage that showed in the final results? -- Original Message -- From: "Carol Richards" <> To: <> Sent: Monday, Ju
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00171.html (9,887 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspotting and itsimpact (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:37:10 -0500
I really don't see the impact of cheeleading or overspotting for R36F that some made such a big fuzz about...they came in No. 26!.. What great impact? Maybe their friends tried to help them but to no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00198.html (12,369 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results/Overspottinganditsimpact (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:47:03 -0500
Paul, So now spotting gives WRTC points? Nope. Then why the No. 1 spotted team R36F dropped to place 26? Your logic makes no sense. Hk3CW Rob -- Original Message -- From: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00215.html (10,132 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] no no MUST be 579 (was 599) (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:29:58 -0500
Ignorance of the rules doesn't make you immune to them. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00463.html (10,537 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 16:57:53 -0500
No more NAQP stuff ... MERRY Christmas to all de HK3CW Rob.. (no skimmer for me... yuuuckkk!) -- Original Message -- From: "Radio K0HB" <> To: "Bruce Horn" <>; "c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00373.html (9,687 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:21:44 -0500
Ron, My guess would be because although some contries are geografically in North America they are classified as North America for Radio purposes, take for example, San Andres Is. it's NA-133 or for s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00170.html (10,796 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mult passing: is it okay to use? (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:28:19 -0500
Let me chip in from the casual contesters side. Often, I like to play in a contest and although I appreciate a station asking me to QSY for a multiplier, what most stations do is not "ask" they "orde
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00279.html (13,755 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mult passing: is it okay to use? (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:49:59 -0500
Hello Guy, There's not really "a best way", all a contester has to do (as with all human relationships) is be polite. If I feel like I'm being "corraled" into qsying I won't move an inch. Contesters
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00286.html (18,024 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mult passing: is it okay to use? (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:54:57 -0500
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00293.html (11,502 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Some positives / HS0ZCW (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:53:33 -0500
Ditto I am up to my ears with 3 or 4 people talking about how (NOT) to cheat. I do recall ham radio being a hobby.. 73 de HK3CW Rob -- Original Message -- From: "rob" <> To: <cq-con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00044.html (7,928 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] I am going to work the HS0 multiplier on all band inall contests now (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:08:16 -0500
Hi Doug... Don't you know the meaning of sarcasm? Don't take life so seriously....relax.. I'm absolutely sure Tree is being sarcastic..nothing else.. 73 de HK3CW Rob -- Original Message -- From: "Dou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00426.html (9,393 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Help us choose our 80th Anniversary LCRA logo! (score: 1)
Author: "HK3CW" <>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:16:58 -0500
Hi Everybody, This is not about contesting but sure does have to do with ham radio. The Colombian Ham Radio Association ( LCRA) is having it 80th anniversary this year and we want to conmemorate it w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00464.html (7,627 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Oh please, dont tackle me (score: 1)
Author: "Roberto Rey" <>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 17:37:53 -0500
I don't really agree with that assessment. Radiosport is not a "I'm stronger than you am sport". We are supposed to be gentlemen on the air, and if I have a frequency I really do expect other operato
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00354.html (9,252 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 1500 W output ... stop the limit :) (score: 1)
Author: "Roberto Rey" <>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:00:21 -0500
Luc, Your Spanish is not correct. You can't blame them for cheating if you don't understand what you are reading. Read again and take back your accusations. 73 de Rob HK3CW -- Original Message -- Fro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-09/msg00096.html (10,623 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 1500 W output ... stop the limit :) (score: 1)
Author: "Roberto Rey" <>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:47:42 -0500
Hi Bob, The confusion lies in this sentence: En los ultimos meses, ingenieros de IESA / INEPAR, han hecho un trabajo de estudio sobre las posibles lineas de alimentación .. It says his engineers are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-09/msg00100.html (13,442 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] In the light of the 2013 CQ WW DX CW Claimedscores. (score: 1)
Author: "Roberto Rey" <>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:33:26 -0500
I agree just saying "I want a new scoring system because scores are unexplainable and people cheat" is irresponsible.. If somebody has proof of cheatingyou need to just flat out say it . ... .it's ve
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00099.html (9,734 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Video Songs (score: 1)
Author: "Roberto Rey" <>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:52:21 -0500
How about "on the radio" Donna Summer.. 73 de Rob HK3CW -- Original Message -- From: <> To: <> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 11:10 AM Subject: [CQ-Contest] C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00207.html (19,442 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu