Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@outlook.com: 433 ]

Total 433 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [Amps] FCC Denies Expert Linears' Request for Waiver of 15 dB Rule; Long off topic reply (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 06:42:20 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Yes, I'm sure. HOA's and home builders have political power too. Politicians will balance opposing interests and go with whichever will bring the most vo
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00009.html (8,245 bytes)

222. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 21:38:44 +0000
I believe people don't homebrew their radios for the same reason they don't build their own cars: While it can be done, and some people do, it is not cost-effective. Many decades ago you could homebr
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00027.html (7,975 bytes)

223. Re: [Amps] FCC Denies Expert Linears' Request for Waiver of 15 dB Rule; (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 21:51:35 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: This privilege is a double edged sword. About ten years ago I was operating during a RTTY contest on 40 meters when I noticed a fairly strong blast of wh
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00028.html (8,151 bytes)

224. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:35:34 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: The most cost effective approach to ham radio is to buy quality used equipment. If one buys the really good stuff, one can almost always resell it later
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00041.html (8,144 bytes)

225. Re: [Amps] VHF all-mode and DC-to-daylight rigs (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 02:57:33 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: That capability is already here. Check out the FlexRadio 6000 series. I bought a 6300 (the low end model) about a year ago mostly out of curiosity. I wil
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00071.html (8,150 bytes)

226. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 08:36:41 +0000
It occurs to me that one could have some fun and make a few bucks homebrewing coax cable assemblies. I would suggest using crimp style PL-259 connectors and making up a variety of lengths. You cold s
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00076.html (8,840 bytes)

227. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:28:10 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Same with the marine environment. For some reason, hams seem to prefer soldered over crimped, but if properly done, you can try to pull apart a crimped c
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00078.html (9,227 bytes)

228. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:23:46 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Or maybe they are marveling at the quality and affordability of modern day equipment of all kinds. Let's hold a seance and find out. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00088.html (8,712 bytes)

229. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:40:39 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Why is everyone knocking the term "homebuilt dipole"? Try building a dipole that will withstand years and years of rain, ice, snow and hurricane force wi
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00089.html (9,251 bytes)

230. Re: [Amps] Decline of homebrewing? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 00:45:55 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: A good rule for working around HV: Never trust a voltmeter that reads zero. It could be broken. Best way is to read the full HV, shut things down and wat
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00158.html (8,904 bytes)

231. Re: [Amps] Alpha Seventy HV Meter Readings (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:06:05 +0000
I'm glad your meter is reading correctly now, but one question remains: Why did it read wrong in the first place? From your description it seems like the meter circuit was designed wrong by Alpha in
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00275.html (7,947 bytes)

232. Re: [Amps] Alpha Seventy HV Meter Readings (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 09:57:17 +0000
That still doesn't explain the original error. I see two possibilities: 1. Alpha designed it wrong in the first place. or 2/ Some component changed value. So, which was it? Or was it something else?
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00277.html (16,675 bytes)

233. Re: [Amps] Alpha Seventy HV Meter Readings (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:13:23 +0000
I don't have the 70x schematic before me, but if it is like most modern amps, ground is not B-. HV should be measured from B+ to B-. not from, B+ to ground. Check your schematic. The difference is no
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00282.html (9,507 bytes)

234. Re: [Amps] Comet vacuum variable capacitor data (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:33:47 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I would caution against using broadcast radio variables. 300 Vpk sounds like enough until there is a 'SWR fault in which case it likely to arc. Once an a
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00292.html (7,995 bytes)

235. Re: [Amps] Alpha 76 160 meter 2nd harmonic (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:21:40 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Also, are you using a multiband antenna which might be resonant on the second harmonic? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Am
/archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00300.html (7,434 bytes)

236. Re: [Amps] PowerGenius XL Video (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:29:30 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Me too. When this amp was first announced I was pretty gung ho for it, but now I'm not so sure. A single 8877 will do anything the SS amps will do except
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00029.html (8,180 bytes)

237. Re: [Amps] PowerGenius XL - Others (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 03:11:44 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Every long time DXer will tell you that there are times when an extra dB makes the difference between Q and no Q. True or not, it's what they believe and
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00036.html (8,957 bytes)

238. Re: [Amps] PowerGenius XL Video (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 03:20:13 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I have to disagree. A pair of 3-500Z's has 1 kW plate diss, which is enough if you can get 60% efficiency which is not hard. Many amps with two tubes are
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00037.html (8,690 bytes)

239. Re: [Amps] Power thread (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 19:13:59 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Not true, as any long term DXer will tell you. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http:
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00055.html (7,240 bytes)

240. Re: [Amps] Power thread (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 22:55:34 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I did the math and guess what? 1500 watts is louder than 1000 watts. You're welcome. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00064.html (7,207 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu