Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@outlook.com: 433 ]

Total 433 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [Amps] Power Thread (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 23:51:00 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Enough louder. Just as you thought. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00066.html (7,330 bytes)

242. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 03:09:02 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: it could be done but you still have to get rid of the heat. Keep in mind that so-called "water cooled" amps are really cooled by air. The water is just a
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00094.html (7,534 bytes)

243. Re: [Amps] Checking Filament Voltage (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:59:27 +0000
Apparently your filament transformer is separate from other transformers (plate). I'd suggest running the AC line outside the amp and using a Variac. The drawback to taps is your line voltage can var
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00155.html (8,253 bytes)

244. Re: [Amps] Checking Filament Voltage (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:08:37 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: IMO, if inrush current is a concern, one should install a step-start circuit rather than depend on a rheostat which might or might not be sufficient. 73,
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00164.html (8,380 bytes)

245. Re: [Amps] Maintenance-free (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:18:58 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: AMEN to that Cathy, although I have to admit that today's cars run so much better than the oldies! My six year old Ford Escape starts instantly in any we
/archives//html/Amps/2017-02/msg00216.html (8,235 bytes)

246. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 01:44:43 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: De-ionized water is NOT pure, it is merely free of ionized atoms or molecules. There may still be impurities which are not ionized such as organic molecu
/archives//html/Amps/2017-03/msg00026.html (7,389 bytes)

247. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 20:30:14 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Rain picks up any contaminants that are in the air that it falls through. It is neither de-ionized nor distilled. If I recall a Weather 101 lecture right
/archives//html/Amps/2017-03/msg00034.html (8,642 bytes)

248. Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:30:37 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Be careful with this. A couple of years ago there was a ham on the East coast running a class E amp during a RTTY contest. It was producing a white-noise
/archives//html/Amps/2017-03/msg00048.html (7,911 bytes)

249. Re: [Amps] 240 Volt Blowers needed (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 20:32:12 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: IMO, EBM-Papst makes an excellent blower, although expensive. They are superbly balanced. You can hold it in your hand while running and barely feel any
/archives//html/Amps/2017-03/msg00113.html (7,398 bytes)

250. Re: [Amps] Labeling house circuits (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:11:43 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: You could also use Avery labels, available in many sizes, and download a template for each one from Avery's website. I run the labels through my HP laser
/archives//html/Amps/2017-03/msg00138.html (8,262 bytes)

251. Re: [Amps] Labeling house circuits (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 02:24:24 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: That is good if they are going to be in an environment where there is a lot of abrasion, but a layer of clear shipping tape is what I use and it is prett
/archives//html/Amps/2017-03/msg00140.html (8,877 bytes)

252. Re: [Amps] New Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 18:36:28 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Oddly enough, the FlexRadio website doesn't have a word about it. Did they announce an availability date? 73, Bill W6WRT ________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00012.html (7,521 bytes)

253. Re: [Amps] New Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 18:50:47 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: They are taking p[re-orders, priced at $6999. http://www.4o3a.com/index.php/power-genius-xl/ 73, Bill W6WRT _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00013.html (7,179 bytes)

254. Re: [Amps] New Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 19:38:13 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I agree, that needs further explanation. Also, I still have not seen any mention of an antenna tuner, whether one is built in or if an external one is ne
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00015.html (7,591 bytes)

255. Re: [Amps] How to build your next tube amp (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 19:33:02 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Absolutely fascinating, especially considering when it was built. Thanks, John! 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps maili
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00024.html (6,982 bytes)

256. Re: [Amps] New Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 22:59:53 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I can think of several ways where transistors are superior to tubes: 1. When not abused, transistors are far more reliable than tubes. 2. Safer. A 50 VDC
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00028.html (8,533 bytes)

257. Re: [Amps] New Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 01:46:33 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Not necessarily. ICAS has been defined as five minutes on, five minutes off. Within the five on, it's 100% duty cycle. If there's a better definition of
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00030.html (8,792 bytes)

258. Re: [Amps] New Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 02:15:19 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: The Ameritron and Heathkit amps you mentioned are NOT comparable, IMO. For one, they are designed to meet a price point, not a performance point. A more
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00032.html (9,217 bytes)

259. Re: [Amps] New Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 02:20:38 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Tubes are notorious for becoming gassy due to air leaks and for internal arcing, neither of which transistors do. There is a reason tubes plug into socke
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00033.html (8,336 bytes)

260. Re: [Amps] New Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:51:13 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Sure you can. I don't know the exact time the 9500 needs to change bands and retune, but it's about the blink of an eye. Of course that is hard on the mo
/archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00038.html (8,665 bytes)

Current List: 241 - 260
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu