Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@ispwest.com: 233 ]

Total 233 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [Amps] Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:20:32 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If I wanted ancient history, that's where I'd look. Codes change sometimes and that's why the post. 73, Bill W6WRT __________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00179.html (8,398 bytes)

102. Re: [Amps] Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:51:49 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I'm not so sure. It has changed once that I know of when they went from a three wire plug to four. After sifting and filtering all the responses, I b
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00186.html (9,120 bytes)

103. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 07:26:55 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I'm not sure that is the "safest" approach, event though it is allowed by NEC. IMO, the safest system is to use two hots and a safety ground, and no
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00249.html (8,897 bytes)

104. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:32:56 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes, I'm sure that is the reason the four-wire circuit is permitted. I still maintain the safest and best approach for future equipment would be two
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00268.html (9,932 bytes)

105. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:47:27 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I'm afraid it actually is more complicated than you think. First of all, if your fan stops running that itself is a safety hazard, but the complicati
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00269.html (10,691 bytes)

106. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 07:40:13 -0800
<snip> <snip> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Are you citing your one experience with an open neutral as proof that it is safe for everybody? I have seen other posts about the havoc caus
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00300.html (11,283 bytes)

107. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 07:52:35 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If I were writing the NEC, I would not allow that type of 120/240 equipment. Make it one or the other and require a separate step-up or step-down tra
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00302.html (11,165 bytes)

108. [Amps] Ultimate safety for house wiring (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:52:32 -0800
You have all indulged me regarding my quest for the safest way to do 120/240 volt wiring and I appreciate that. Looking ahead to the distant future, here is something I would like everyone, including
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00307.html (8,265 bytes)

109. Re: [Amps] Better electrical safety? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 07:58:24 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you mean the mechanical vibration at 1kHz, I agree it might be difficult to eliminate, but still worth experimenting with. If you mean the electri
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00342.html (7,903 bytes)

110. Re: [Amps] New power system (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 08:07:04 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Your statement puzzles me. A house powered by AC mains of about 1 kHz or higher is shockproof. The human nervous system does not respond to frequenci
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00343.html (7,454 bytes)

111. Re: [Amps] Ultimate safety for house wiring (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 08:13:36 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ What's wrong with the picture is you got both DC and RF together. RF alone would have caused only the burn part, not the shock part. Serious enough,
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00344.html (9,383 bytes)

112. Re: [Amps] Ultimate safety for house wiring (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 08:22:31 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Agreed. That was my original intent. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00346.html (8,845 bytes)

113. [Amps] Conversation stopper? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:20:59 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The only "waste of bandwidth" I've seen so far is the above post. All the others had something to contribute. Ok, this one qualifies too. Sorry. :-)
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00354.html (8,915 bytes)

114. Re: [Amps] Better electrical safety? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:33:02 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 400 Hz is too low to be "shockproof". I've performed the experiments on myself and that's how I know. For me, the threshold is about 600 Hz. At 1 kHz
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00355.html (8,519 bytes)

115. Re: [Amps] Conversation stopper? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 07:51:22 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Actually, I would like to hear about the solid-state amp, even though they have been discussed here before. Be sure to include information about the
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00371.html (8,666 bytes)

116. Re: [Amps] 2 kW amp project (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 07:58:21 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Not being a QEX subscriber (maybe I should be) I'd like to hear more about it. I considered a SS amp before beginning my current 8877 project but was
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00372.html (7,764 bytes)

117. Re: [Amps] 2 kW amp project (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 16:47:51 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sounds good. I almost wish I hadn't started the 8877 project but it's too far along to stop now. :-) Where does one find the surplus telecom supplies
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00390.html (8,147 bytes)

118. Re: [Amps] 4K-Ultra Restoration (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:20:45 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Try West Marine. They have 15 kv wire at .89 per foot. I bought 20 feet of it and it's good stuff. 73, Bill W6WRT ___________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2005-12/msg00066.html (7,254 bytes)

119. Re: [Amps] Antenna traps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:05:09 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I have a W9INN trap dipole which will handle the legal limit all day long. INN is an SK now and I don't now if his antennas are still being sold, but
/archives//html/Amps/2005-12/msg00160.html (8,002 bytes)

120. Re: [Amps] Designing the Cleanest Linear with RF Negative Feedback (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:17:01 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This is a question I've often wondered about. Does a cathode resistor in a grid-driven amp actually produce negative feedback, or does it merely redu
/archives//html/Amps/2005-12/msg00185.html (10,627 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu