Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:don.field@gmail.com: 53 ]

Total 53 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Maybe a better idea for certificates (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 18:33:39 +0100
On the contrary, the problem will be in getting participants to accept the idea - I am amazed at how many IOTA contest participants expect certificates (or even plaques) for "winning" their country o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00113.html (11,086 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Typing practice (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 18:39:15 +0100
Not all contest adjudicators rely 100% on automation. For CQWW it is understandable that they have gone this way, because the task is huge. With the IOTA contest, which I manage, we use automated che
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00114.html (9,289 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Support (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:36:39 +0100
Which may be true but won't be a win-win for ever, because the contest will eventually disppaear up its own orifices! There's a side to this which hasn't been explored. The fact is that contests do c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00177.html (12,027 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Support (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:15:15 +0100
What I should also have added to my previous post is that there is an inherent fallacy in the argument that one should necessarily subscribe to CQ Magazine to feel justified in entering its contests.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00178.html (9,492 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Callsigns, Logging and Cabrillo (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:36:13 +0100
I recall Gary VE3XN (VE3GCU at the time?) operating G3/... from my QTH on the Saturday of WPX and being back in Canada in time to operate the last few hours of the contest from his home QTH! Don G3XT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00202.html (8,504 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupe Question -- correction (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:29:25 +0100
Still wrong Ev. It all depends on which contest and which robot. There isn't some magic "robot in the sky". Every contest organiser has a different system. For the IOTA contest, for example, we certa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00302.html (9,278 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] A portable rig that would serve well forcontestingtoo? (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:20:18 +0100
There are many portable rigs that would be more than adequate for single-op contesting in a DX environment. But there are far fewer rigs that would work if there were two or more of you trying to ope
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00060.html (8,484 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW. I "get it". (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:53:14 +0100
I've been enjoying following this thread. I think I get it now. If you don't like a particular contest because the scoring system or the method of adjudication (or the time taken with certificates, o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00411.html (9,025 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:08:02 +0000
A lot of the discussion here is missing the point. It's actually pretty easy these days, as a contest adjudicator, to see if anyone is using packet. Here's an example (and I'm currently completing ad
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00313.html (8,412 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Scoreboards ??? (score: 1)
Author: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:40:45 +0100
Surely in almost every sport the participants know how the competition is doing. We don't erect screens between the tracks on an athletic field, for example! Why would contesters want to be different
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00141.html (12,503 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] IOTA contest this weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:19:47 +0100
A final reminder that the IOTA contest is this coming weekend (29/30 July) 12z Saturday to 12z Sunday. Everyone can play island stations send RS(T) + serial + IOTA ref. Others send RS(T) + serial. Fu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00468.html (6,888 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Leveling the Geographic Playing Field [was:WhydidtheCanadians (PT5M) beat the Americans] (score: 1)
Author: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:14:52 +0100
There's only one way to truly level the playing field and that's to sit all the ops at a computer and get them contesting with Morse Runner or whatever. No variability in antennas, take-off angle, te
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00333.html (11,778 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] IOTA Contest Logs (score: 1)
Author: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:18:36 +0100
Just a few days more until the log submission deadline. Please submit your logs to iota.logs@rsgbhfcc.org We still appear to be missing logs from the following participants who each made a substantia
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00380.html (8,106 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] IOTA Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:07:17 +0100
Those of you who submitted by e-mail should have received an e-mail telling you where to find the Provisional Results and also a personal URL taking you to your UBN (UBNs have been available for the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00223.html (7,029 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Am I blessed or what???? (score: 1)
Author: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 19:47:37 +0000
Take care John. A friend told me a similar tale recently. He took his good lady at her word and bought a MkV or something similar. When he told her the price she nearly filed for a divorce on the spo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00030.html (8,266 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1)
Author: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 10:51:02 +0000
This thread is getting exceedingly boring. How would it help if US stations got points for working each other? Yes, they would all end up with more points, but the leading US entrants would probably
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00057.html (8,212 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] RSGB IOTA Contest - Final Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:01:01 +0000
This is to announce that the IOTA contest results appearing on the website (see below for URL) are now Final. There have been very few changes from the provisional results, but there were a couple of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00464.html (9,325 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] What if we had real-time LOGGING? (score: 1)
Author: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:07:13 +0000
Certainly couldn't have been this year Yuri - no Internet access from several of the WRTC operating sites. Don G3XTT (referee at one such site - no Internet and a "very" dodgy cellular signal - somet
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00851.html (11,790 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Get Rid of the Assisted Category (score: 1)
Author: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:56:35 +0000
Try doing this with single-band scores in CQWW and see if you get the same answer Jamie. Mults become relatively much more important when you are constrained by choice of category to a much smaller p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00446.html (11,886 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pre-emptive QSLing - was:Contesters and LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:20:00 +0100
The question Pete is surely "universally accepted" for what? Why do people want QSL cards? 1. To decorate the shack wall and show to friends and family. 2. To apply for one of the thousands of awards
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00087.html (10,417 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu