Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:eedwards@oppd.com: 267 ]

Total 267 documents matching your query.

121. [RFI] TVI Help (score: 1)
Author: k0il@qsl.net" <EEDWARDS@oppd.com (k0il@qsl.net)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 12:44:06 -0600
I'd at least get a good quality Low Pass filter for your shack to start with. Don't know about the new one you mentioned, but they do help in certain cases. Go with whatever you can afford within re
/archives//html/RFI/1998-02/msg00005.html (8,737 bytes)

122. [RFI] Re: Local police and RFI problems (score: 1)
Author: k0il@qsl.net" <EEDWARDS@oppd.com (k0il@qsl.net)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 12:56:16 -0600
and: Sure they do. One big difference is the piece of paper issued by the US Federal Government (FCC) called an Amateur Radio license. Hold up this piece of paper and MOST local officials will back o
/archives//html/RFI/1998-02/msg00009.html (9,283 bytes)

123. [RFI] UPLC media release on BPL (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 14:44:00 -0500
Does anyone know what the UNE Decision was? Maybe I ought to ask the UPLC... de ed -K0iL -- For Immediate Release August 22, 2003 For More Information Contact: Mark Gedris Marketing Communications Ma
/archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00152.html (9,244 bytes)

124. [RFI] eEngineer -- Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 09:57:58 -0500
Interesting site. http://www.radioing.com/eengineer/rfi.html _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
/archives//html/RFI/2003-10/msg00006.html (6,507 bytes)

125. RE: [RFI] Getting WiFi Upstairs (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 07:43:52 -0500
Check with wither Andrew or RFS (cablewave). Andrew's leaky coax is called radiax (their regular cable is heliax). RFS calls it Radiaflex. Check out: http://www.andrew.com/ And http://www.rfsworld.co
/archives//html/RFI/2003-10/msg00012.html (7,980 bytes)

126. RE: [RFI] Getting WiFi Upstairs (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:27:06 -0500
My post yesterday was in a bit of a hurry. Of course with any leaky coax system you need amplifiers, and in the case of 2-way comm you'll need a BDA-Bi-Directional Amp like Tx/Rx makes. At work we us
/archives//html/RFI/2003-10/msg00014.html (8,608 bytes)

127. RE: [RFI] Quiet Shack PC Systems? (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:33:30 -0600
When I purchased my PC, I took a portable SW rcvr along and shut down all nearby CRTs and listened to each of the CRTs I was looking at. Then I bought the quietest one. It so happens that the quiet o
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00069.html (8,760 bytes)

128. RE: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:33:25 -0600
Here's another take on the subject of pigeon-holing of engineers. Most, if not all ethical codes for professional engineers require that engineers put society & the public good above that of his comp
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00003.html (8,689 bytes)

129. [RFI] Correspondance with UTC (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:03:55 -0500
Thought I'd share this exchange I had with the UTC (United Telecom Council). It can be read top to bottom. I just can't believe he does not see all the similarities. I find it interesting that when t
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00034.html (13,824 bytes)

130. RE: [RFI] another one sided news essay (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:04:08 -0500
"There's no interference because electrical current and digital 1s and 0s run at different frequencies." Now we know what the BPL geeks mean when they say there's no interference. They mean no interf
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00095.html (7,497 bytes)

131. RE: [RFI] Lawsuit (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:08:19 -0500
It seems to me that this is the only way we're going to stop them. The FCC sure won't no matter how bad the interference. If you're a ham and not already an ARRL member, I strongly urge you to become
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00102.html (7,340 bytes)

132. [RFI] RE: ARRL (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:48:25 -0500
Good rebuttal Alex. You are correct, the ARRL does not represent you. In fact no organization represents you at all. To the federal government, when it comes to all of the commercial interests that d
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00117.html (10,358 bytes)

133. RE: [RFI] Protecting our frequencies (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:04:41 -0500
Funny, Everything you said about the Satellite bands also applies to the HF/VHF bands as well. Are you also appalled that a few tinkering HF hams would stand in the way of the usefulness of HF-BPL fo
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00139.html (8,098 bytes)

134. RE: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 10:14:58 -0500
On the scale required for most or all automobiles to convert, you'd have to cover up the State of Arizona and then some. Not that some states don't need covering up, it's just not feasible. The NIMBY
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00025.html (8,433 bytes)

135. RE: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 11:00:57 -0500
As far as BPL goes, I believe the FCC Commissioners are made up of 2 republicans and 2 democrats plus Powell. They all voted for it (1 abstained-same effect as for it) to continue. No politician is g
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00051.html (9,046 bytes)

136. RE: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? Give up? NO! (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 14:14:21 -0500
Rob, You make some good points, but I don't think it's big business that has caused this apathy, it's big government. After the FCC rcvd the last round of comments and with over 95% of those comments
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00056.html (9,783 bytes)

137. RE: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? Give up? NO! (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 08:34:30 -0500
I haven't allowed anyone to make me apathetic. I just didn't have the time to waste on the FCC and it's appointed commissioners who all had their minds made up BEFORE they were even appointed. I foll
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00064.html (8,089 bytes)

138. RE: [RFI] another alternative to BPL (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 12:35:35 -0500
That's because the TV broadcast industry has a very rich and powerful lobby. --Original Message-- All of a sudden, the FCC is concerned about interfering with licensed (TV) services... Dave N&Oslash;
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00116.html (6,622 bytes)

139. RE: [RFI] FCC Forum on Wireless Broadband (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 13:43:34 -0500
Eric, Were counting on you to represent Amateur Radio since you're a local. Also, be sure to post to the BPLandHamRadio yahoogroup so more hams interested in the subject can attend. 73, de ed -K0iL -
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00120.html (8,956 bytes)

140. RE: [RFI] FCC Forum on Wireless Broadband (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 14:33:02 -0500
Yes, you're correct. But Wireless has the most potential for putting BPL out of business! We need to keep tabs on it for that reason. de ed -K0iL --Original Message-- From: rfi-bounces@contesting.com
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00122.html (10,197 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
This search system is powered by Namazu