Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:f5vhj@orange.fr: 62 ]

Total 62 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest Recording (score: 1)
Author: Albert Crespo <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:06:47 +0100 (CET)
This year CN2R ( W7EJ) posted the recordings of his many contest operations. http://cn2r.net/cn2r/index.htm . It was interesting to hear my own QSOs with Jim and how sometimes they were difficult to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00433.html (8,701 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] QSL (score: 1)
Author: Albert Crespo <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:24:59 +0100 (CET)
If a card has multiple QSOs on it, if you indicate on your paper work to the ARRL what QSO you want credit for, you are then excluding all the other QSOs and will not be charged for these contacts. 7
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00222.html (6,797 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Change WPX Hours (score: 1)
Author: Albert Crespo <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:32:24 +0100 (CET)
1. Reduce the hours to 30 means less stations on the air. This is good? Who are you contesting with if stations must reduce the maximum number of hours by 17%? 2. Strategy- If the hours are less, my
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00525.html (7,630 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] WPX Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Albert Crespo <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 08:13:55 +0200 (CEST)
I gave out a RS report 2898 times last week as TO5A. You figure as to whether I would have liked to have avoided having to have done   this. I was going to respond to 4O3A's comments as  to whether  
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00049.html (9,741 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting Errors (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:38:38 -0800
People with long calls increase the rate of error that the other station will bust their call. If I find in my log something like KZ0ZZZ , it is more likely to be a product of fatigue at my end then
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00071.html (10,756 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:37:15 -0800
If you send in a log, and claim a score, is it rocket science that how you got that score would be open to public scrutiny? Maybe those who do not want there logs to be public should also encrypt the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00505.html (10,528 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contester e-mail addresses? (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:29:22 -0800
Dave, www.qrz.com does show the email. However, if not provided to qrz.com, it is not included. My email address shows up FRANCE Click to enlarge... F5VHJ ALBERT CRESPO LIMOUSIN 47120 ST. ASTIER DE D
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00243.html (9,323 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:18:57 -0800
It would not be surprised if 6Y1V contacts start to show up in logs in greater frequency then in the past. Since there will be no way to verify 6Y1V QSOs, this multiplier is ripe to be added to those
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00275.html (14,432 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] No US DX Only - ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:08:25 -0800
Suppose there was a tennis competition that was not professional. One person walks on the court , also a competitor but not in this match, and starts yelling, "excuse me, excuse ". One of the partici
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00391.html (12,711 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Putting the spoon into the pot: WPX - who is onfirst? (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:53:02 -0800
CQ's policy to spread the plaque winners around so that one station does not win multiple plaques is a good one. The purpose of specific class plaques like a North American plaque is rendered meaning
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00020.html (14,057 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:16:05 -0800
Mike, If somebody ask you to spot them, then they should be reported to the sponsor. Ignorance of the rules is not a defense. If you do not understand the rules, do not play the game. Anything else i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00231.html (12,326 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Band Plans (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 10:33:36 -0800
In Senegal, we are allowed to operate SSB from 7000 KHz to 7.1 KHz. The licensing authority has not yet allowed operation from 7.1 to 7.2 KHz. 73, Albert, 6W1RY -- Original Message -- From: "Andrei S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00091.html (11,113 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:41:04 -0800
JT1XYZZ runs 1 militate in Ulan Bator on 1840 KHz which is heard by his "remote receiver" and is accessible to the public on the Internet. JT1XYZZ can also be heard real time on the Internet on his w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00211.html (12,900 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] Extreme Nonsense (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:31:07 -0800
JT1XYZZ runs 1 milliwatt in Ulan Bator on 1840 KHz which is heard by his "remote receiver" and is accessible to the public on the Internet. JT1XYZZ can also be heard real time on the Internet on his
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00256.html (9,036 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] 2008 CQWW 6W1RY (score: 1)
Author: Albert Crespo <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:05:42 +0200 (CEST)
I received a penalty for not being in the D4C log on 20 meters. I made the mistake of not recording the entire contest. I thought I had worked this station but I just shrugged it off that I was not l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00216.html (7,886 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] 10 Minute Rule (score: 1)
Author: Albert Crespo <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:42:42 +0200 (CEST)
In this day and age of spotting, maybe it is worth considering the issue of the ten minute rule being out of date and just abolishing it. It does not increase scores, but rather has the opposite effe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00229.html (7,400 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections->Hijacked Thread (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:59:36 -0800
Live video cams require non amateur radio transmissions. That is prohibited by the rules. If the rules are changed that every competitor must also use the Internet then it is no longer an amateur rad
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00254.html (14,608 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:43:25 -0800
Why have more limits? Who benefits from only allowing one signal at time from a multi-single? Is this going to produce more QSOs in the contest.? More importantly, why would anyone bother to enter th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00332.html (7,451 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] CQWPX (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:37:35 -0800
Prefixes counting as multipliers per band is a bad idea. Bad enough that the WA6 station across the street counts as the same multiplier as a JT, but what a joke it would be if you could move this WA
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00439.html (10,103 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2010 WPX Rule Change / Circle rules (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:47:48 -0800
How many club members attend meetings when there is a 275 Km radius limitation? The concept of people joining a club and having face to face interaction is somewhat dated in this age of the Internet
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00039.html (12,748 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu