Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kzerohb@gmail.com: 927 ]

Total 927 documents matching your query.

381. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: [N1MM] New RAC (ARRL contest) sections (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:06:31 -0800
All things being equal (and they never are, of course), scores in SS will rise by a factor of .0375. Yawwwnnnn! I have bigger things to worry about. But if we need to have controversy, this one beats
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00089.html (12,914 bytes)

382. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operation question (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 20:36:51 -0500
If you are present in the shack and alert to his activity "real time" (not off taking a nap) he can operate under your control operator privs. If he is alone in the shack, he is limited to his own li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00093.html (7,781 bytes)

383. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer, etc.... (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:54:51 -0800
Tony, we don't want to do any of that last-century-Radioman stuff. Contesting is now electronic splat-ball. We just want to point and shoot. Fye Nye Foe, de Hans, K0HB Why not do it like we used to d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00208.html (9,105 bytes)

384. [CQ-Contest] This cheating is getting out of hand (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:18:47 -0800
See here --> http://tinyurl.com/bmvx2x7 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his radio" -- Proud Member of: A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op Minnesota Wireless contesters - http://www.W0AA.o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00230.html (7,788 bytes)

385. Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:15:22 -0500
In my not so humble opinion, using two frequencies on the same band during a contest is inconsiderate at best. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00301.html (8,607 bytes)

386. Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:03:30 -0500
I'm lost on this one, guys. Why should a station (just because they're low power, or DX) be privileged above us "commoners" to a second QRG for clear reception? Good luck on this one now! 73, Hans, K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00320.html (11,153 bytes)

387. Re: [CQ-Contest] Whata contesting "fun" nowadays (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:04:48 -0500
Absolutely! What is the RF equivalent of dark glasses and a white cane? 73, de Hans, K0HB "Just a Boy and His Radio" _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00370.html (7,541 bytes)

388. Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in contests-an observation (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:47:21 -0500
Some contesters evil twin might calculate a means to confound the "ID-every-fortnight-clan". Naw........... 73, Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00376.html (10,059 bytes)

389. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARROGANCE AND GOING SPLIT (Jim Neiger) (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 22:12:39 -0500
I used to be conceited, until I learned that it was a fault, of which I have none. Dit dit _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00005.html (7,817 bytes)

390. Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 09:43:53 -0500
It's been an interesting thread, and has shortened my "Respected Contesters" roster by at least a couple of calls. 73, de Hans, K0HB aka: oblivious _______________________________________________ CQ-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00014.html (9,446 bytes)

391. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:10:32 -0500
Yuri, with all due respect your ideas are unreasonable, outrageous, not needed, and Draconian. If adopted, they would stifle Radiosport. Every contester, in his own mind, is a "top contester", but fe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00103.html (9,461 bytes)

392. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 23:54:49 -0500
Ken, the way to eliminate concerns about cheating would be to just to eliminate the contest. For this discussion I will presume that would be an unacceptable approach. So let's discuss Yuri's suggest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00106.html (11,796 bytes)

393. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:10:26 -0500
Jeff, Your argument seems to be "since all this assistance is available, we'll just assume that everyone ought to use it, and even if they don't, score them as if they did". Sort of "If you don't wan
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00150.html (13,080 bytes)

394. [CQ-Contest] The Grand Solution (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:04:13 -0500
Some here have proposed that we could solve the problems in contesting by a variety of means, including video recordings, audio recordings, 1-hour log deadlines, elimination of traditional single-op
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00177.html (9,351 bytes)

395. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Grand Solution (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:15:26 -0500
Eureka! N2IC mentioned XE-inspired beverages, and W7DRA mentions wife. So I tried some of that beverage. It came to me in a moment. There is SIN in SINgle Op! Hereafter, all ops must be MARrried (not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00181.html (8,635 bytes)

396. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:47:41 -0500
Suppressed carrier (dial frequency) should be at least 3kHz away from the SSB band edge. On 20m USB that would be 14.347 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his radio" -- Proud Member of: A1 Operato
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00046.html (10,568 bytes)

397. [CQ-Contest] Idiom Press (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:16:08 -0500
Does anyone know the secret password to contact Idiom Press? I want to spend some money on CONTESTING equipment from them, but cant raise them on email or published phone numbers. Quick, before K0CKB
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00143.html (8,210 bytes)

398. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rule Changes (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:30:04 -0500
Why would anyone need to know your call. Just slows things down. We could suspend calls completely in contests, and think of how the scores would increase. "QRZ" "FYE NYE FOE" "FYE NYE EIGHT QRZ" "FY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00162.html (10,272 bytes)

399. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rule Changes (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:17:41 -0500
You might want to go stand on a chair, Dave, and read that message again, because it went over your head the first time. OF COURSE it's silly! Next time I'll bracket it with indicators. [SILLY] ....s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00183.html (13,155 bytes)

400. Re: [CQ-Contest] Idiom Press (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:00:17 -0500
I have an email response, they're building a batch this week, and should ship Monday. 73, Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00204.html (8,509 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu