Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kzerohb@gmail.com: 927 ]

Total 927 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 05:32:42 -0800
Barry, you are absolutely right. The higher the incidence of log submissions, even thin logs like mine, the more complete a picture the sponsor has of the participation and the more accurately he can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00535.html (10,638 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:36:32 -0800
Vigilante-ism at its finest. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00574.html (8,519 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs: Why? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:37:16 -0800
Paraphrased: "Rather than figure it out for myself, I hijacked the work product of other contesters to improve my score." 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00575.html (8,090 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs: Why? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:14:58 -0800
On the contrary, I've learned a lot from others. I read every word I can find on the topic. I even run a reflector dubbed "The University Of Radio Propagation". I'll admit that I find them boring. N
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00577.html (8,466 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coming Back! (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:24:06 -0600
Hi Tom, and welcome back! I haven't found a SINGLE program that's excellent for contesting and ALSO excellent for general log-keeping/awards management/DXing/etc. After many trials I've settled on tw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00083.html (9,071 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a deadline a deadline ? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:53:35 -0600
Paper logs postmarked after the deadline date. Electronic logs time stamped (see header) after the deadline hour. 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest maili
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00177.html (8,801 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:15:24 -0600
K0CKB and I love the hectic clamor and excitement of a good contest, and we're delighted that in our favorite contest (ARRL Nov SS) the logs are still kept private. We'll still participate in the hec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00268.html (9,656 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Re: CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs] (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:11:02 -0600
Point 1) I think we all expect that the contest sponsor will be brutally "picky and exhaustive" in examining our entry, especially those entries from world-class stations like KY1V/6Y1V. We expect it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00295.html (9,277 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 million qso's? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:11:17 -0600
Certainly a significant percentage of hams weren't required to complete a Morse exam, but not "The vast majority". 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00004.html (7,155 bytes)

50. [CQ-Contest] And now for something completely different...... (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:56:40 -0600
For several weeks this reflector has been consumed with issues and insinuations regarding cheating rascals who don't want their logs viewed by Aunt Emma, cheaters who wait until the last second to su
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00025.html (7,423 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:08:03 -0600
If the reason to open logs to the public is to place sunlight on cheaters (which seems to be the predominate reason advanced here), does this mean that even the "check log" guys are cheaters? Sunnuva
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00113.html (8,195 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:14:03 -0600
Mike, inserting logic into this discussion is cheating. Shame on you! 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00114.html (8,885 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:59:21 -0600
Nor have we seen any compelling argument why they should be not be closed. 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00150.html (9,931 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:31:41 -0600
Good plan. Trust the log checkers. That's been my plan all along. It's their job to thoroughly, exhaustively, and fairly judge the contest. 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 ______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00162.html (9,932 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:32:16 -0600
Neither is Radiosport contesting. 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00184.html (9,374 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dx peditions and contests (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:29:43 -0600
It'd be even nicer to have them participate in the contest. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00253.html (7,540 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dx peditions and contests (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:31:37 -0600
I'd have to check the rules, but I think they'd count as "KP4" for mult and points. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00258.html (8,994 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dx peditions and contests (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:35:58 -0600
Never mind! Only contiguous states and provinces are mults for DX. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00259.html (9,267 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dx peditions and contests (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:21:04 -0600
It's a catch 22. Although the prefix "KP5" is reserved for Desecheo, no KP5xx callsign will ever be issued. You can only get a KP5xx callsign if you have mailing address on Desecheo. There are no ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00263.html (9,140 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP5 Call (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:40:46 -0600
David, This situation isn't a "new" thing; many expeditions over the past 10-15 years have lacked "appropriate" prefixes. I think a lot of us care, but it isn't in our power to change it here. 73, d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00282.html (7,840 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu