Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:list@k0nr.com: 88 ]

Total 88 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover cllsign vs logging robots NOW LoTW certificates (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:47:12 -0700
That's an important point. While the initial LoTW callsign validation takes a while (and I think still includes something mailed to your FCC address), any additional callsigns that can be clearly tie
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-01/msg00043.html (8,181 bytes)

62. Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW Uploads (was Logging Rovers vs the log checking robots) (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 21:49:02 -0700
Time for grid circling to go to a whole new level :-) On 06-Jan-17 8:06 PM, Jonesy W3DHJ via VHFcontesting wrote: There'll come the day when a rover sends out his autonomous, self-driving vehicle, lo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-01/msg00055.html (9,675 bytes)

63. Re: [VHFcontesting] MSK144 contacts in cabrillo (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 16:43:37 -0700
Roger, Thanks for the rational explanation. It's odd that cabrillo uses a higher level construct for voice communications (Phone) and a more specific format for digital communications (RTTY). Too bad
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-01/msg00137.html (18,147 bytes)

64. Re: [VHFcontesting] MSK144 contacts in cabrillo (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 17:33:13 -0700
Jay, I don't know if LoTW truly "cares" about Cabrillo...I don't think they've implemented the AI feature yet :-). But LoTW does accept Cabrillo for most contests https://lotw.arrl.org/lotw-help_deve
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-01/msg00139.html (20,634 bytes)

65. Re: [VHFcontesting] Attenuation from polarity mismatch (Re: C6AFP Six Meter Beacon (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:00:28 -0700
Well put. My experience, though not as complete, is consistent with yours. 73, Bob K0NR On 29-Jan-17 7:11 PM, Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting wrote: As everyone else said, it depends. For ionospheric
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-01/msg00141.html (11,146 bytes)

66. Re: [VHFcontesting] hmmmmm... (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:51:52 -0700
Very clever system. Mostly useless, but clever. 73 Bob K0NR http://what3words.com/ 73 Jonesy W3DHJ calm.instruments.absorbing _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing lis
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00030.html (7,956 bytes)

67. Re: [VHFcontesting] modes question, what do we log C4FM or DSTAR as? (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 17:49:10 -0700
Don't forget, VHF contests generally count contacts once per band, without regard to mode. So you don't get more points for working the same station on different modes. 73, Bob K0NR OK, Apologies to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00053.html (14,657 bytes)

68. Re: [VHFcontesting] grid + topo map for rovers (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:38:46 -0600
For some contests, I've been doing a combination SOTA activation plus VHF contest operation. This is mostly when I don't have all weekend to seriously contest, it makes for a fun outing. Single Op Po
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-04/msg00057.html (10,321 bytes)

69. Re: [VHFcontesting] Maidenhead grid locating for Rovers (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 08:35:31 -0600
Historically, its been the Garmin GPS's that offer Maidenhead readout. I came across this page that might be helpful: http://www.n7cfo.com/vhf/gps/~gps.htm 73, Bob K0NR I also have a Garmin eTrex. It
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-05/msg00059.html (10,453 bytes)

70. [VHFcontesting] Fwd: What frecuency should we use from Cuba? (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 20:12:49 -0600
VHF Contesters: Any suggestions on a 2m fm frequency to use from Cuba (below 146 MHz)? See below. 73, Bob K0NR Hi Bob... A cuban group of hams are planning to be active from western Cuba during ARRL
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-06/msg00015.html (8,669 bytes)

71. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fwd: What frecuency should we use from Cuba? (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 20:31:52 -0600
There's also the misc/experimental range: 145.5 to 145.8 MHz. The trick is they will need to get "spotted" somehow or no one will ever here them. Maybe ON4KST? 73, Bob K0NR On 05-Jun-17 8:18 PM, Pete
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-06/msg00017.html (8,416 bytes)

72. Re: [VHFcontesting] This weekend VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 07:39:55 -0600
This point about being polite on 146.52 MHz is worth repeating. If contest stations dominate that frequency for the entire contest, we'll probably see a petition drive to reverse the rule change that
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-06/msg00023.html (7,977 bytes)

73. [VHFcontesting] CO9CTT Will be QRV from Cuba - Looking for 2m FM Skeds (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 07:12:20 -0600
Look for CO9CTT active from Cuba on 145.6 MHz FM during the contest. (Cuba does not have 2m privileges above 146 MHz.) 73, Bob K0NR Hi Bob... Could u forward the following information? Julio/CO3JY an
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-06/msg00047.html (9,922 bytes)

74. Re: [VHFcontesting] First-timer questions (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 08:43:44 -0600
This may be helpful: How to Work a VHF Contest http://www.k0nr.com/wordpress/my-articles/how-to-work-a-vhf-contest/ I'm planning on trying the June VHF contest as my first time. I'll be operating as
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-06/msg00066.html (7,938 bytes)

75. [VHFcontesting] Beta Release: WSJT-X Version 1.8.0-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 07:29:30 -0600
Anyone planning to use the beta-released FT8 mode during CQ WW VHF Contest? I have no experience with it and no opinion on whether its ready for prime time, just asking. 73, Bob K0NR On 11-Jul-17 6:3
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-07/msg00022.html (8,620 bytes)

76. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 and the CQ VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:59:37 -0600
Thanks, Steve N8BJQ. I went back and looked at the rules (again), which say this about assistance: IV. QSO Alerting Assistance The use of any technology or other source that provides callsign or mult
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-07/msg00051.html (9,775 bytes)

77. Re: [VHFcontesting] The digital modes and the Sept contest.... (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 12:51:58 -0600
Agreed. I do wonder if this is a temporary phenomenon of people trying a new thing or is it permanent? 73 Bob K0NR On 12-Sep-17 11:34 AM, jon jones wrote: Mike has a good point. Many ops now seem to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-09/msg00069.html (9,901 bytes)

78. Re: [VHFcontesting] Digital Questions (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 08:45:30 -0600
W9RM, Here's how I have been parsing this... let's just assume you are correct that many people are lowering their VHF contest score by using digital modes too often or in situations where it is coun
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-09/msg00137.html (11,263 bytes)

79. Re: [VHFcontesting] Thoughts on the Digital Modes and VHF Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 07:11:43 -0700
There's another principle well established in vhf contests: don't discriminate between QSOs by mode. None of the major VHF contests give you different points based on modulation/mode. (In contrast, F
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-01/msg00122.html (11,077 bytes)

80. Re: [VHFcontesting] Portable 50 MHz beam antennas (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 08:17:47 -0700
Zack, I'd be interested in the 144 MHz yagi design for backpack portable operating. Its got to be compact and easy to assemble, otherwise it tends to get left at home. For me, compact is nothing long
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-02/msg00057.html (12,357 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu