Mail Archive Search: <+from:mgilmer@gnlp.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:mgilmer@gnlp.com: 89 ]

Total 89 documents matching your query.

61. [AMPS] QRO CQ callins (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 12:20:44 -0400; On Wednesday, May 19, 1999 10:59 AM, Jon Ogden [SMTP:jono@enteract.com] wrote: week of These US This is perhaps the biggest thrill (unless I ever become K1AR and win) that I get during DX contests (o; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00230.html (7,409 bytes)
62. [AMPS] FCC Actions at Dayton (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 16:03:40 -0400; So many laws seem only to create jobs for bureaucrats and more lawyers, who in turn create more laws - mostly designed to protect us from ourselves. Most are either unenforced of unenforceable (I don; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00270.html (9,197 bytes)
63. [AMPS] Re: Ferrite Rod for 6M Amp (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 16:00:05 -0400; There seems to be a lot of "going around" on this Ferrite Rod thread (but you KNEW that!). Pardon what may be stupid questions - I'm a hardware guy who's gone "soft" :o) I'll jump in anyway, and mayb; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00332.html (9,835 bytes)
64. [AMPS] Follow Up on the SB-220 Follow UP (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 15:08:52 -0500; Seriously - weather. Who said that, engineers or the executive management? are Did you have the chance to measure the resistors BEFORE the big bang? Only way to know for sure. Mike -- FAQ on WWW: htt; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00439.html (9,854 bytes)
65. [AMPS] Congrats SM2CEW (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 10:22:01 -0500; Obviously, that someone never called CQ in a DX contest! Mike N2MG On Saturday, March 20, 1999 9:57 AM, Jon Ogden [SMTP:jono@enteract.com] wrote: -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html; /archives//html/Amps/1999-03/msg00508.html (6,914 bytes)
66. [AMPS] duplicate copies (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:29:20 -0500; I have been getting double postings for a while, although (only) some can be explained by them being "legit" postings to multiple reflectors. Of course, some messages are posted to AMPS and CCed to s; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00009.html (9,722 bytes)
67. [AMPS] FW: Mail failure (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 09:02:30 -0500; Anybody know what this Mail Failure means? To: <amps@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contes; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00011.html (11,711 bytes)
68. [AMPS] FW: Mail failure (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 09:33:42 -0500; Boy, I guess there could be many reasons why this Mail Failure message appears - what do the reflector administrators want us to do if we see one? I had assumed that I was getting it alone but I supp; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00013.html (8,184 bytes)
69. [AMPS] duplicate copies (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 09:41:54 -0500; Maybe he got tired of us and pulled his email account out of Motorola (HI) or worse... I was told the account's been un-subscribed - we should see these no more. Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.c; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00016.html (8,540 bytes)
70. [AMPS] FW: Mail failure (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 14:42:11 -0500; Yup - still getting it John To: <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQ; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00035.html (13,944 bytes)
71. [AMPS] Cantenna Dummy loads (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 14:02:05 -0500; Not knowing the innards of the Cantenna, may I suggest a quick test for the usefulness of simply a bigger can of oil. The test would be to see if the sides of the existing Cantenna are warm after the; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00111.html (10,166 bytes)
72. [AMPS] Cantenna Dummy loads (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 15:08:10 -0500; I'm not sure if I understand the first sentence entirely, but it seems to indicate that you are counting on the presence of the water coils as being sufficient to cause or improve oil circulation. I; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00115.html (11,073 bytes)
73. [AMPS] Re: Cantenna (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 16:26:37 -0500; Yup, too bad about that oxygen part! Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: own; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00118.html (6,904 bytes)
74. [AMPS] Fwd: Mail failure - HELP!!!! (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 10:19:19 -0500; Jon, many (all?!) of us are. I emailed the POSTMASTER@az25ms.mot.com (which I think is Motorola Arizona) personally and he said the account was for someone who was either terminated or retired. Why t; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00137.html (8,183 bytes)
75. [AMPS] Test: DELETE ME (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 14:20:18 -0500; Test 0 Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search:; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00180.html (6,393 bytes)
76. [AMPS] Metalworking Questions (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 17:23:22 -0500; There's a pun here somewhere: John Kay? Heavy Metal? Anyone else see it? Sorry - Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative request; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00189.html (9,487 bytes)
77. [AMPS] 3-500Z chimneys (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 14:00:56 -0500; Seen many melted pins (on some 3-1000, too, I think). Thought the air systems must have gotten blocked - guess the air system was designed/spec'd poorly to begin with! Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http:/; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00615.html (8,171 bytes)
78. [AMPS] RG-58: living dangerously? (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 11:57:55 -0500; Me thinks RG-141 -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search:; /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00251.html (8,787 bytes)
79. [AMPS] RG-58: living dangerously? (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 12:12:45 -0500; Correction: Actually, RG-141 is a **solid** center/Teflon dielectric "version" of RG-58. Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00252.html (7,266 bytes)
80. [AMPS] ARRL (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:53:43 -0500; Beware: Soapbox approaching! The ARRL may be "all (we've) got" but that sure doesn't mean we have to like it. It, like many other organizations (incl. governmental) seem to evolve into self-aware ent; /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00420.html (8,873 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]