Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n2icarrl@gmail.com: 485 ]

Total 485 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [CQ-Contest] 10/15 interaction - No More (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:48:00 -0700
Glad you got it fixed, but, you didn't have 20 watts coming into the K3. It would have been smoking. That would also indicate your Dunestar only has about 19 dB of rejection. Far less than what K9YC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00055.html (8,332 bytes)

322. [CQ-Contest] Phone SS - Be there ! (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:28:30 -0700
This is one of those rare years when there are two weeks between Phone SS and CQWW CW. Imagine that - you will have 12 days to recover between major contests ! The are many Phone SS section records d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00062.html (7,458 bytes)

323. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 08:37:08 -0700
With the exception of ARRL, CQ and the Scandinavian Activity Contest, the rest of the worlds contest organizers have moved on and allow single operators to use the Cluster if they want. It doesnt ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00012.html (10,435 bytes)

324. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs.: SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 17:21:19 -0700
However, KU7Y is concerned that they can't afford a second radio. If they can't afford a second radio, it is hardly likely that they can afford the antennas needed to win a competitive class in a maj
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00042.html (8,747 bytes)

325. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 18 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 09:43:27 -0700
Mats, You would have a very different perspective on WAE and RDXC if you were in my shoes. In the southwest corner of the W5 call area, we simply do not have much propagation to Europe during the tim
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00064.html (13,642 bytes)

326. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 18 Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:13:51 -0700
You give a picture that many Americans would be "discouraged" to work you in case they knew it was the Russian DX Contest? Would you imagine many Russians thinking the same way about the American Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00077.html (9,645 bytes)

327. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting without spotting (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:34:52 -0700
As someone who operates unassisted almost 100% of the time from home, it is unusual that I get clobbered by a "packet pileup" in the manner that Tom describes. Almost always, by the time I find someo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00193.html (9,566 bytes)

328. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:26:02 -0700
Yes, I was called by the same guy. After he gave me his exchange, I asked "YO ?" and he said yes. Bull. Glad I worked a real YO on Sunday. I would hate to get credit for a wake multiplier. 73, Steve,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00285.html (9,406 bytes)

329. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 13:03:33 -0700
Since I was mentioned in a previous posting, I'll say a few words about my QTH and HFTA. I live on a hilltop with 400 feet of dropoff within 1/4 mile from NW, through N, E, SE and S. However, towards
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00025.html (12,994 bytes)

330. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH, hilltop or seaside? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 17:39:37 -0700
On 01/03/2015 04:18 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On Sat,1/3/2015 12:03 PM, Steve London wrote: If you are playing with HFTA, I strongly urge you to do a sensitivity analysis by changing your datapoints, rand
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00029.html (10,866 bytes)

331. Re: [CQ-Contest] Names (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:52:41 -0700
As Good Neighbor pointed out, Cabrillo supports long field sizes -- it is the logging program implementation that is the issue. All us N1MM users will loose those contacts because your cabrillo will
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00103.html (9,107 bytes)

332. [CQ-Contest] Popgun Sprint CW thoughts (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:48:59 -0700
3. In Sprint, small signals can't move to the edge of the fray to CQ; the edges seem to be too dynamic. This does work in CW Sprint, where the bands aren't as crowded. If you're weak and/or slow, a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00024.html (8,777 bytes)

333. Re: [CQ-Contest] [SMC] Sat Night Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:51:35 -0700
It may be possible, and legal, if station 1 is running SO2R. Not just SO2R makes it legal - The station must also work another station at least 5 kHz away, and not just call an unanswered CQ or get b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00026.html (8,423 bytes)

334. Re: [CQ-Contest] K1N pile ups (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 07:12:09 -0700
W2GD, one of the K1N operators, is a big fan of the CW Sprint. Navassa would be a multiplier in Sprint. Just wondering if ..... 73, Steve, N2IC You might as well forget about the K1N boys doing anyth
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00030.html (8,012 bytes)

335. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 08:58:37 -0600
Tim, Not sure if you actually read some of the previous postings - especially the one that said cqcontest.ru is now cqcontest.net . Dmitry, the owner of cqcontest.net, has recently complicated the pr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00112.html (10,331 bytes)

336. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 06:29:26 -0600
Let's get something straight. The posting of scores is done automatically by the contest logging software. There is no "wasting of time" by the operator. 73, Steve, N2IC _____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00161.html (9,034 bytes)

337. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:20:48 -0600
Since modern laptop computers don't even have parallel (LPT) ports, it's a moot point. Jim selects the technologies he uses. No need to rush into things that do not work. You and Jim can continue to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00173.html (9,950 bytes)

338. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW check logs (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 15:44:23 -0600
As I have learned, Checklogs can be used for nefarious purposes. In particular, there is a Swedish operator who works many people in the contest, but then deletes calls from his log if he does not th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00039.html (8,470 bytes)

339. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW check logs (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 19:33:53 -0600
Dale, You seem to have misunderstood several key points in my posting. To summarize: - Anyone can send in a checklog, for any reason. - The score of a checklog is not calculated or published. A check
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00043.html (10,179 bytes)

340. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW check logs (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 19:39:57 -0600
Let me clarify with an example: SM7XYZ makes good QSO's with 10 stations, including, for example, W1EBI. The submitted logs of all 10 stations show a QSO with SM7XYZ. SM7XYZ does not like W1EBI. Befo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00044.html (11,108 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu