Mail Archive Search: <+from:n9dg@yahoo.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:n9dg@yahoo.com: 407 ]

Total 407 documents matching your query.

101. [TenTec] USB/Serial/ARRGGGHHHHH! (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:13:12 -0700 (PDT); I have had great success for the last year or so driving up to 3 Pegasi and an RX320 with a 4 RS232 port PCI card from SIIG, Inc. http://www.siig.com/products/io/features/QuartetSerial850PCI.html As; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00138.html (11,934 bytes)
102. [TenTec] transverters on 6m (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 08:56:49 -0700 (PDT); If you are going to be using a Jupiter as an IF radio it would be reasonable to expect similar overall performance to the 526 since they share a certain amount of similarity. The main difference betw; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00157.html (11,313 bytes)
103. [TenTec] using Delta II w/6 meter transverter? (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:49:44 -0700 (PDT); Consider a transverter for 2M. That will give me another easy to work 2M station from EN53 :). Seriously though it would give you a real good sense of how a transverter will work without duplicating; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00385.html (8,690 bytes)
104. [TenTec] TenTec 524 (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 21:21:56 -0700 (PDT); I wouldn't get too wrapped with having all bands in one box. If you are serious about VHF/UHF weak signal work you want mono-band radios for each of the bands anyhow. There is also good reason to hav; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00100.html (8,751 bytes)
105. [TenTec] 526 6N2 rig and 6 meter amp (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:29:11 -0700 (PDT); The 20W of the 526 will drive the typical 6M brick fine, probably even need to back off the drive a bit. An Astron RS-35 or SS-30 series power supply will handle such an amplifier handily. While thi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00256.html (8,869 bytes)
106. [TenTec] Ju;iter/Pegasus RS232 Communication vs TCP/IP (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 21:23:25 -0700 (PDT); It is fixed at 57,600. The main advantage of a Jupiter over a Pegasus is that you do have more versatility by virtue of having traditional controls AND 100% computer control. While RS232 ports may go; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00298.html (13,037 bytes)
107. [TenTec] re: 3d display of spectrum from WA0TTN (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 22:38:01 -0700 (PDT); Yes it is somewhat along the lines of what I'm thinking, this basic style of frequency spectrum display presentation could be included as one of the options for the "spectrum display centric" band tu; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00311.html (9,206 bytes)
108. [TenTec] Ju;iter/Pegasus RS232 Communication vs TCP/IP (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 06:43:51 -0700 (PDT); Dave, Maybe I'm reckless, but I'd bet far more than a nickel that your assessment about the hardware implementation is essentially correct. As for the need to restrict audio streaming bandwidth I thi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00313.html (10,840 bytes)
109. [TenTec] new tranciever deliveries (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:30:26 -0700 (PDT); However if you accept the notion that a "Software Defined Radio" can never be truly complete, then "incomplete" software in and of itself is not a problem. The basic assumption is that as a designer; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00363.html (8,529 bytes)
110. [TenTec] Pegasus NB (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 21:55:31 -0700 (PDT); There may be several different variables at work here. First keep in mind that only firmware versions 1.15 and later have both Noise Reduction (NR) and Noise Blanker (NB) capability. This version of; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00371.html (11,034 bytes)
111. [TenTec] Just a quick thought... (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 09:49:45 -0700 (PDT); I surely hope so, if they don't I will be sorely disappointed, and it would then be just like all their imported competition. In a word boring, because once you've bought it, you own it with NO prosp; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00444.html (9,366 bytes)
112. [TenTec] Jupiter firmware problems. (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:34:17 -0700 (PDT); I too agree that this would be an excellent way to handle these kinds of firmware releases. Those of us who aren't squeamish about alpha and beta code can go ahead play, and the more conservative typ; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00501.html (9,345 bytes)
113. [TenTec] Definition of "SDR" (was - OMNI D FIRMWARE) (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:31:17 -0700 (PDT); W5YR: ?Sadly, we have yet to see a true "software-defined" radio from ANY manufacturer. We have had *software-controlled* radios for years now, but even with the Kachina, Pegasus, Jupiter, et al, you; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00552.html (15,148 bytes)
114. [TenTec] IF-DSP: More, less, or more or less? You choose. - A VHF/UHF perspective (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:08:39 -0700 (PDT); I have been wondering if this is where the state of the digital based radio art is at today. I guess that those A to D chip designer guys have some catching up to do. Hmmm, I guess this indirectly an; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00575.html (9,280 bytes)
115. [TenTec] NEWS FLASH - FIRST PIX INSIDE an ORION (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:49:03 -0700 (PDT); Actually what I perceive to be the RX (and low level TX?) band pass filter board (upper right radio quadrant of "voldermort-orion-inside3.jpg") looks like it may be diode switched unless there are sm; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00160.html (9,656 bytes)
116. [TenTec] DSP IC's ? (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:48:37 -0700 (PDT); They all use the Analog Devices ADSP2181 family of DSP's, can't recall exact clock speeds or part numbers though. Yes they are 16 bit. I'm fairly sure that they haven't been End Of Lifed by Analog De; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00247.html (7,206 bytes)
117. [TenTec] Why no DSP upgrades for the 6N2? (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:05:05 -0700 (PDT); This is my take on it too. Goes to show that pre-announcing too soon will actually hurt you in the long run. Hopefully the Orions will start shipping for real in September. That'll be 6 or so months; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00258.html (9,051 bytes)
118. [TenTec] RX-340 DSP output (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:21:54 -0700 (PDT); <snip> <snip> No doubt there are some tremendous possibilities here. There is no good technical reason why all new ham IF-DSP based gear shouldn't be able to provide a similar kind of digital signal; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00334.html (7,778 bytes)
119. [TenTec] New FREEWARE for Pegasus/Jupiter (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 09:22:46 -0700 (PDT); There does seem to be some issue(s) with NT kernel based OSes. I too can't get it to play under Windows 2000, but can under Windows 98. Has anyone tried it with Windows NT 4.0?? Duane N9DG __________; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00354.html (9,308 bytes)
120. [TenTec] USB -> RS232 (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 19:09:04 -0700 (PDT); I'd rather see Ten Tec put energy and effort into TCP/IP Ethernet interfacing in the next generation radios. It's a far more versatile and open standard than USB. Trying to rationalize a reason or wa; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00373.html (8,376 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]