Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Zero point QSO's (score: 1)
Author: Sergey Shitov <>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 15:31:16 -0800 (PST)
Good discussion. Really I don't see the point of encouraging domestic contacts in CQWWDX. More domestic QSO's will on the other hand impact on DX contacts i.e. a DX will be last in a queue to work th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00047.html (7,698 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Annual Suggestion - opinions (score: 1)
Author: Sergey VK2IMM <>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Hi All, This was a good topic to follow. I must be in a minority here but I see a very little good in introducing more divisions in contest categories in CQWW. Everyone knows that is a long contest a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00487.html (8,130 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW zero pointers etc (score: 1)
Author: Sergey VK2IMM <>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 12:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
One should still make an effort to get those multipliers and often that means installing an antenna only to make 2-3 QSOs on that band. Certainly the M/M stations are the likely candidates to be work
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00125.html (7,517 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] CQWW - discussion on 1 point for intra country QSOs (score: 1)
Author: Sergey VK2IMM <>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 08:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
In recent discussion not too many gave a hint what impact it would make to DX and and as it has been said - DX means distance. It is hard enough to make a 7000 mile QSO in CQWW, make it even harder w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00173.html (8,030 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Recent discussions on this reflector (score: 1)
Author: Sergey VK2IMM <>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:40:16 -0800 (PST)
I was reading with interest recent debate discussing purity of contest results. It appears that most operators who submit logs are interested in the result analysis which help figuring out what other
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00233.html (8,460 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] reg "assisted" debate and more (score: 1)
Author: Sergey VK2IMM <>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:08:32 -0800 (PST)
As it seemed to evolve into another topic where everyone have to have an opinion here is my comment. We seem to contest in the way we find it to be most fun. Some prefer using DX cluster spots while
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00544.html (9,659 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Q: Inrad versus Kenwood YK filters (score: 1)
Author: Sergey VK2IMM <>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Going off topic with recent debates. Has someone got real comparative data on the ultimate out of passband attenuation of an YK88C versus a similar Inrad filter #98? Kenwood quotes this figure to be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00605.html (6,990 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Contest categories and technology, suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Sergey VK2IMM <>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
There seem to be endless debates about contest categories on this reflector. These carry some good ideas and at the same time they make me think whether I should skip a year or two in taking part in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00376.html (8,613 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW? (score: 1)
Author: Sergey Shitov <>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 10:29:38 -0800 (PST)
I also find that 2 points within NA is a kind of odd rule. Even more, operating from W6 lately I would rather prefer to have 1 point within NA but to allow 1 point QSOs between the states in USA to k
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00171.html (8,574 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW? (score: 1)
Author: Sergey Shitov <>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 15:17:53 -0800 (PST)
Driving distance perhaps. Direct path is just over 5000km to be correct. On the other hand UA3 to UA9 path is well positioned and scores nicely. Sergey VK2IMM ................ Rich, For the record. T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00186.html (9,696 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu