Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa4kxy@bellsouth.net: 238 ]

Total 238 documents matching your query.

101. [VHFcontesting] Fourlanders W4NH Sept. contest plans (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 00:14:37 -0400
Once again, the Fourlanders W4NH contest group will be operating from Soco Bald between Cherokee and Maggie Valley, NC in grid EM85jm. We will have 50 MHz through 2304 MHz. Big antennas (stacked beam
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-09/msg00023.html (7,703 bytes)

102. [VHFcontesting] Sprints start Monday night (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 16:43:48 -0400
2007 Fall VHF/UHF Sprint Rules: 1. Object: To work as many amateur stations in as many 2 X 1 degree grid squares as possible, using authorized amateur frequencies on the 50, 144, 222, 432 MHz and Mic
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-09/msg00105.html (10,940 bytes)

103. [VHFcontesting] 2 Meter Sprint Logs Email Address (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:12:27 -0400
I wanted to let everyone know that there was a mistake in the rules on www.svhfs.org with regards to the email address to send the logs for the 2 meter sprint. The correct email address is ottf(at)wb
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-09/msg00140.html (7,488 bytes)

104. Re: [VHFcontesting] 2 Meter Sprint Logs Email Address (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:38:15 -0400
Not that I am aware of but if you drop Ott an email I am sure he will let you know if he has your log or not. 73 Jim, W4KXY mistake email have are new Since there was a mistake, is there a list of re
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-09/msg00142.html (8,723 bytes)

105. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Re: Sprints start Monday night (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:10:04 -0400
Being one of the guys who put the rules together and does the logs for the fall sprints I though that I should respond. I guess I don't understand what your concern is Alan. The rule says, "Use of te
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-09/msg00149.html (11,076 bytes)

106. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6M Sprint UTC Time Question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 23:48:17 -0400
I will take this one since I am one of the SVHFS folks who runs the Fall Sprints. Since all of the other Sprints (2 Meters and up) are on bands with relatively restricted range they all use local tim
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-11/msg00007.html (9,848 bytes)

107. Re: [VHFcontesting] Who's driving that rover? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:43:48 -0500
Here is the scoop guys. An operator can do anything. Tune the radios, put up antennas AND drive. But, an operator CAN NOT be switched out. You can have another person called a driver who can do NOTHI
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00070.html (10,121 bytes)

108. Re: [VHFcontesting] Who's driving that rover? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:46:21 -0500
Before I answer I want to say one thing. Even though I am a member of the VUAC and helped write the new rover rules I am not the official final say on the rules. That is KX9X at ARRL HQ. I believe th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00097.html (14,502 bytes)

109. Re: [VHFcontesting] Who's driving that rover? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:56:40 -0500
Sorry guys but I botched the answer to number 3. I told you to ask KX9X!!! Anyway, you said in number 1 that the driver (you) had operated and that confused me. If the driver (you) do not operate the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00098.html (10,703 bytes)

110. Re: [VHFcontesting] Informed Opinion [was: Who's driving thatrover?] (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:54:15 -0500
Now all we need is a judicial branch. Anyone want to volunteer for that? 73 Jim, W4KXY Here is a list of individuals who (probably) had direct input to the rules (legislative) changes that are being
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00099.html (12,541 bytes)

111. Re: [VHFcontesting] Another rookie question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 00:52:37 -0500
One more bit of advice. Make sure that you take a copy of your amateur radio license and a copy of QST with the contest info in it. I have never met a rover who didn't get stopped by the law at least
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00137.html (12,266 bytes)

112. Re: [VHFcontesting] Stamp Increase Jan 14, 2008 (from Canada) (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 23:38:32 -0500
The problem is an eQSL can't be used for anything except look at it and LotW is far from free. 73 Jim, W4KXY Postal rate increases everywhere sure make eQSL.cc and LotW and any other types of "free"
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00054.html (9,278 bytes)

113. Re: [VHFcontesting] Stamp Increase Jan 14, 2008 (from Canada) (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 23:59:00 -0500
It is my understanding from talking to folks that use LotW that uploading your log is free but if you want to use it for an award it is like $2 a card. If true, that would make a DXCC or VUAC an expe
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00057.html (10,336 bytes)

114. Re: [VHFcontesting] Stamp Increase Jan 14, 2008 (from Canada) (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 01:33:22 -0500
Yes, I have already been informed that my $2 figure is incorrect. My apologies to the reflector for distributing incorrect information and not getting my facts straight. 73 Jim, W4KXY piece of paper.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00059.html (10,908 bytes)

115. Re: [VHFcontesting] Regulation Question Revisited (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 02:51:14 -0500
I think the FCC did away with most if not all of those regulations years ago. Remember when you had to sign mobile or portable and log every contact? I still have a logbook around here that I carried
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00200.html (8,372 bytes)

116. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:07:38 -0500
While I agree with much of what you say in principle, it is almost impossible to make contacts on the higher (microwave) bands with out making schedules. It is hard enough with the schedule! Speaking
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00248.html (13,967 bytes)

117. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF sked alternative (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:35:29 -0500
All I can say is look at were you are and were we are. If we ever made a random contact on a microwave band I don't remember it. Let me clarify one thing though. Like you, many times we will work som
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00250.html (10,234 bytes)

118. Re: [VHFcontesting] September VHF Results On The Web (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:16:06 -0500
No problem Sean. To everyone else, cut Sean some slack. He is new to the job and still trying to figure out which way is up. Some of you guys need to switch to decaf coffee or something. 73 Jim, W4KX
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00082.html (8,427 bytes)

119. Re: [VHFcontesting] Reverse Incentive Licensing (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:04:10 -0500
I agree with John, W1RT. It is most likely an administrative screw up. Did you do the renewal yourself? If so, you probably did something wrong on the form. That is not a criticism. I renewed my vani
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00098.html (12,407 bytes)

120. Re: [VHFcontesting] Reverse incentive Licensing (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:09:20 -0500
OK, so you went through the ARRL VEC to do the renewal like I did. I would contact the ARRL VEC on Monday and explain what happened to them. I am sure they can contact the FCC on your behalf and get
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00099.html (9,450 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu