Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Your\s+Call\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Your\s+Call\?\s*$/: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:44:35 -0500; Funny story? Actually sad story, but funny. I hear a station from down south running a pileup - from the second radio. I have a pretty good run going so I wait. I listen to probably 15 stations worke; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00240.html (8,888 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: Marko L Myllymaki <marko.l.myllymaki@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:09:38 -0800; I think both are good ways to handle it. Also from DX station side who does not ID. If he does not ID he does not want/need you to enter into his pile-up, he is busy already working down what he has.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00241.html (10,348 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:36:33 -0700; Especially on Sunday, I don't think it will add to your pileup if you ID more frequently. Most of the people in the pileup already know who you are, thanks to the use of spots. The unassisted guys th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00248.html (9,209 bytes)
24. [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: Marko L Myllymaki <marko.l.myllymaki@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 02:58:39 -0800; Hi Steve, Yes I have heard that feedback and it is noted as I have mentioned. I'm not fan of 1 min rule. I think it is "overregulation". Everyone has that big knob on their radio and nobody needs to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00263.html (10,025 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:09:07 -0600; I think if someone works a DX station and asks for the DX station's call, the DX station either provides the call, or loses the Q and gets a NIL. Steve's solution answers everybody's needs: a DX stat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00270.html (11,993 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:35:57 +0500; Hi Marko, Nice to hear from you. I fully support both of your statements (how often to ID and use of split operation when needed). You are not in the minority. Simply there are less people who were o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00278.html (12,378 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:16:51 -0500; There is one other aspect to also consider: The guy IDs once per minute. He ID's, but he is covered up by QRM. As an S&P guy, do you continue to wait, hoping for a second chance...? Remember - you ca; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00282.html (13,724 bytes)
28. [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:09:21 -0500; A simple solution. Make the callsign part of the exchange like SS. For example if I work P40W he would send KU8E P40W 5NN 5. There were several stations this past weekend in ARRL DX that wouldn't eve; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00285.html (8,859 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:09:24 +0000; I love drinking from the RBN firehose. I love the adrenaline that gets flowing when the rate meter goes higher. Click-and-pounce yields a higher rate than search-and-pounce. Yes, you lose much of the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00286.html (9,677 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: sbloom@acsalaska.net; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 08:13:56 -0900; I'm not sure changing the exchange is realistic (though man that *IS* a great idea) ...but I will comment that I find it increasingly difficult to communicate *anything* other than the contest exchan; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00294.html (10,591 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:20:11 -0600 (CST); Steve, I can't speak for any other little pistol or squirt gun out there, but over the years I've learned a bit of a distaste when someone asks me to QSY to another band. I've had the request made on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00296.html (12,290 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 07:40:42 -0600; Wow. I'd never ask a station running to QSY, and certainly wouldn't be such a knob as to berate someone for not. I don't mind getting the question when I'm s&p, but I don't feel beholden to agree, ev; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00300.html (15,017 bytes)
33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 08:33:11 -0500; I think the solution is quite simple - it should only be acceptable to ask someone else to QSY when they have answered your CQ. In fact, it is bad manners, IMO, to ask anysingle op who is running to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00301.html (13,810 bytes)
34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: sbloom@acsalaska.net; Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:22:51 -0900; Hi all: Exactly. I only ask for a QSY ..when I'm running ...it's relatively slow ..and late in the contest. I also never get offended if they say no. In some contests I'm a fairly rare mult ..if; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00303.html (16,410 bytes)
35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: sbloom@acsalaska.net; Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:24:57 -0900; Hi Ron: For me ..asking for a QSY is something I will only do while I'm running. I would find it extremely discourteous to interrupt someone running. 73 Steve KL7SB Steve, I can't speak for any; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00304.html (13,608 bytes)
36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: Scott Ellington <k9ma@sdellington.us>; Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 14:51:24 -0600; So what is the proper way to politely decline to QSY? Something which means, "Sorry, I do not wish to QSY now, and please let's not argue about it." I often send "SRI", but I'm not sure it get's the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00306.html (13,109 bytes)
37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:10:52 +0000; Dah-dit Da-da-dah Comes to mind ;) Marty W1MD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00309.html (14,784 bytes)
38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: Scott Ellington <k9ma@sdellington.us>; Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 22:51:25 -0600; On 2/27/2016 07:33, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: I think the solution is quite simple - it should only be acceptable to ask someone else to QSY when they have answered your CQ. In fact, it is bad manners,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00311.html (9,284 bytes)
39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:36:52 -0600; The best answer here -- work him, ask for his call, NIL if refused -- isn't about being vindictive, it's simply about giving him the chance to do the right thing. The NIL at the end is required by th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00313.html (10,499 bytes)
40. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1): Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:16:49 -0500; Each amateur station, except a space station or telecommand station, must transmit its assigned call sign on its transmitting channel at the end of each communication, and at least every 10 minutes d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00318.html (12,879 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]