Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: This reflector

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: This reflector
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 97 11:15:11 -0800
>On Mon, 21 Apr 1997, Rich Measures wrote:
>
>> Apparently, one of the boundaries is specifying exactly what the 
>> boundaries are. ...snip...
>Excuse me...  But the only thing I ever objected to was getting in the 
>middle of this fiasco.  I don't care if AG6K, W8JI, and KM1H talk about 
>each other's mothers on this system.  I just don't want to hear about it 
>when they do. ...snip...

Nothing I reviewed was over the top, Bill.  Did you accept the crybabies 
word that things were over the top---or did you read the posts yourself?  
 One solution is to make complaints public.   Do this and I'm guessing 
that most would tuck their tails between their legs and head for another 
fireplug.   IMO, some of this ruckus is residue from the VHF parasitics 
debate. 
cheers   
Rich---                                                             

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K   



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>