Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] neutralization

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] neutralization
From: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner)
Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 06:09:34 GMT
On Tue, 20 May 1997 14:50:13 +0100, "Ian White, G3SEK"
<G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk> wrote:
<snip>

That means that higher Rp in the suppressor leads to a LOWER loaded
VHF-Q and LOWER VHF-gain - exactly the opposite to what Rich still
persists in saying.

<snip>
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
I think I see a basic error in the above.  The R introduced by the
nichrome-wire suppressor isn't Rp, it's Rs - so it's in series with
the suppressor inductance, not in parallel.  Right?

73, Bill W7TI


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>