Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Plate RFC choke design

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Plate RFC choke design
From: w4eto@rmii.com (Richard W. Ehrhorn)
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 17:45:34 -0700
Hi Guys....   Just one comment

-----Original Message-----
From:   Rich Measures [SMTP:measures@vc.net]
Sent:   Friday, March 27, 1998 6:06 AM

.............

That's the popular, traditional, cherished, old theory, at least.
However, orienting two coils end-to-end seemed to me like it would
enhance coupling, not decoupling.  .  I built various hv rf chokes to see
check the cherished theory out.   I observed that chokes wound with the
supposed anti-resonance gaps have pretty much the same resonances as a
same-L choke wound without gaps.

[Richard W. Ehrhorn]  ...... Agreed 100% emphatically, Rich. I wonder if 
anyone ever really analyzed the old variable-diameter and/or multi-section 
chokes.

73,   Dick  W0ID >

.............

 Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>