To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] parasitics |
From: | G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK) |
Date: | Fri, 24 Apr 1998 11:30:57 +0100 |
Carl wrote: > >But yet according to Wes Hayward's web page and Tom Rauch's input, Rich's >stuff does nothing for lowering VHF Q. We all know Rich claims otherwise >but how come Hayward disavows his conclusions and has gone so far as to >publish his own page in refute????? Something has a decided dead fish >smell IMO. > It was Wes Stewart, N7WS. He made comparative measurements between samples of Rich's suppressors and some normal-design ones provided by W8JI. AFAIK the raw measurements are still on Rich's web pages, but it is a matter of record that N7WS objected strongly to Rich's interpretation of them. For some months Wes had a refutation on his own web pages, along with the original measurements, but last time I looked all those pages had gone. 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] parasitics, Peter Chadwick |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] parasitics, Ian White, G3SEK |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] parasitics, km1h@juno.com |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] parasitics, Rich Measures |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |