To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] parasitics |
From: | ggeurts@amp.com (Geurts, Gerard) |
Date: | Thu, 30 Apr 1998 08:49:45 +0100 |
> >Jon, if you believe in those theories that strongly then I suggest > that > >you and Rich team up and publish an article in a reputable journal. I > am > >a strong believer in peer review > > Such journals depend on paid advertising. The month after the > critique > of "The Nearly Perfect Amplifier" was published in the Sept., 1994 > issue > of *QST*: > A HAM radio magazine is not a 'reputable journal' as far as 'real' engineers are concerned. Why don't you try the IEEE Broadcasting Society? Cheers Gerard -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] AL-1500, Chartec Laboratories A/S |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] Emission from Thoria Filaments, Rich Measures |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Class E MOSFET Amps, Pete Smith |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] parasitics, Peter Chadwick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |