Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] parasitics

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] parasitics
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 98 02:23:10 -0800
>> >Jon, if you believe in those theories that strongly then I suggest
>> that
>> >you and Rich team up and publish an article in a reputable journal. I
>> am
>> >a strong believer in peer review 
>> 
>> Such journals depend on paid advertising.  The month after the
>> critique 
>> of "The Nearly Perfect Amplifier" was published in the Sept., 1994
>> issue 
>> of *QST*:
>> 
>A HAM radio magazine is not a 'reputable journal' as far as 'real'
>engineers are concerned. Why don't you try the IEEE Broadcasting
>Society?
>
>Cheers
>Gerard

?  Because I grow tired.  

cheers
Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K   


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>