Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Another arc question

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Another arc question
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Mon, 11 May 98 00:12:40 -0800
>In message <19980510030240.AAB548@[205.231.11.82]>, Rich Measures
><measures@vc.net> writes
>
>big snip
>>
>>You have not explained how lowering R is a parallel L/R suppressor lowers 
>>VHF-Q.  By your logic, the lowest Q would result when R = 0-ohms
>
>In a parallel circuit, lowering R reduces Q.
>
True, however, there's a bit more to designing a VHF-suppressor than Q.   
It seems to me that an optimal suppressor design divides the VHF signal 
fairly equally between suppressor R (Rs) and the suppressor L .   Thus, 
if the reactance of Ls is say100-ohms at the VHF anode-resonance, a 1-ohm 
suppressor R (Rs) is not going to divide current as equally as a 100-ohm 
Rs.  

>If the suppressor has a reasonable path to ground at the matching
>circuit end, then it appears in parallel with whatever the valve looks
>like from anode to ground.
>
 .A large if.    The sticky wicket is undoubtedly VHF resonances in the 
Tune-C that are in the vicinity of the anode-resonance.  
. So why not make Rs = 1-ohm in order to reduce the VHF load R on the 
anode, and thereby reduce VHF gain? 
-  later

cheers
Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K   


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>