To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] Re: |
From: | jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden) |
Date: | Wed, 13 May 98 22:04:52 -0500 |
>How did we get to parasitics again? You have got a one track mind. I am >talking about tank circuit resonances....assuming that the parasitic has >already been suppressed with your wonderful nichrome or a conventional >suppressor. I think we got back on this subject when discussing our DOE of the amplifiers and how the output Pi-network looks to a VHF signal. So if we are concerned about VHF signals, we are concerned with parasitics unless I have totally missed something and we are now talking about VHF amplifiers. If the parasitic has been supressed, why worry about what the pi-net looks at VHF (other than harmonic attenuation)? 73, Jon KE9NA ------------------------------------- Jon Ogden KE9NA http://www.qsl.net/ke9na "A life lived in fear is a life half lived." -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] INFO wtd: QRO DUMMY LOAD, Arthur Moe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] Re: Parasitics, Jon Ogden |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Re:, Rich Measures |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Re:, Jon Ogden |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |