>
>> Why is Tom unwilling to give his technical opinion on a seemingly simple
>> question. So we don't have all the facts. So what. Hypothesize, Tom.
>> Please don't use the red herrings any more.
>
>Let me make this very clear one last time. When I get to the first
>personal insult, I delete the post and don't read any more. I've
>stopped reading most of the constant personal garbage on this
>reflector.
>
Tom,
Where is the insult here? I have not called you any names. I have not
impuned your technical abilities. I have not said one deragatory thing
about you. Please, do not take questions as insults.
>I look at it like this, it takes enough time to discuss technical
>issues. I don't need to be made feel bad, or to be made angry, by
>personal insults.
>
Then let's discuss the technical issues instead of getting off track like
this. Please answer the original question posed by Carl.
>If you have a technical question, ask it. If you are hell-bent on
>fighting or calling names, your talking to the wrong guy. I don't
>play that game in public, and I don't tolerate it in person.
Tom, again, where have I done any name calling? Where have I tried to
fight you? I have agreed with you on several things. Is telling you I
disagree with you an insult? Where is debate.
The technical question was posed by Carl.
You have not answered it yet, but IMHO (no insult here) you have evaded
it.
If my saying you are evading a question is an insult, then I guess we
have a big difference of opinion over what an insult is.
73,
Jon
KE9NA
-------------------------------------
Jon Ogden
KE9NA
http://www.qsl.net/ke9na
"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|