Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re:

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re:
From: w4eto@rmii.com (Richard W. Ehrhorn)
Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 14:57:43 -0600
Hi Guys,

In NMR/MRI, the rf frequency (frequency of nuclear magnetic resonance) 
depends on the element to be imaged and, additionally, is a linear function 
of the magnet strength as described by the Larmour (sp?) equation. The vast 
majority of routine clinical imaging is done on hydrogen because water/H2O 
is the most common material in the body. For hydrogen, the Larmour 
frequency is approximately 42.6 MHz at 1T (1 Tesla = 10,000 gauss). It 
scales linearly from there: at 0.5T it's around 21.3 MHz (anybody heard of 
"MRII" on 15M?), at 1.5T, 63.9MHz; 2T about 85.1 MHz.

The RF power level doesn't necessarily HAVE to vary with magnet strength; 
IMO it's more a function of desired/required "spin echo" signal level, 
which translates into S/N, image clarity, and ultimately machine throughput 
(how many scans can be run through the machine per hour or day - which in 
turn relates directly to return on an investment that commonly runs $1M-3M 
for big MRI facilities. OTOH, I guess if you pay the price ($250-400k??) 
for a multi-ton, 1.5T cryogenic magnet it probably makes sense to have 
15-20 kW of peak (highly linear) rf available to help make efficient use of 
it.

Cheers,    Dick   W0ID

-----Original Message-----
From:   Dave Kirkby [SMTP:davek@medphys.ucl.ac.uk]
Sent:   Friday, May 29, 1998 11:06 AM
To:     Jon Ogden
Cc:     W9JA Paul Hellenberg; amps
Subject:        Re: [AMPS] Re:

.... SNIP .... SNIP etc. ...

> From what I knew NMR and MRI are similar but 2 different
> technologies.
> Of course I could be wrong too.  NMR I thought was used more for
> material
> research while MRI was more for diagnosis of human patients.

> The strength of the amp depends on the strength of the magnetic field
> generated.  The frequency of the amp also depends on the strength
> too.  A
> 2 Tesla system (the strongest that I know of) operates around 64 MHz.
> For the 2T system, I want to say it goes as high as 20 KW, but then
> that
> might be too high (7 KW also comes to mind).  Anyhow, it's much higher
>
> than 1 KW for the bigger systems.  And yes, average power is very low
> on
> these.


> ...  SNIP ...

We have a 2.4 T clinical machine, and a 7 T reseach machine. To the best
of my knowledge, the peak powers are only 1 kW - but I'll check this.

Bruker is another manufacturer of these things, but I dont know if they
use valve PA's.

G8WRB.



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>