Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] mobile 3cx3000s

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] mobile 3cx3000s
From: davidc@bit-net.com (DavidC)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 11:42:17 -0400
I have yet understood why this is not a clear cut case of conspiracy to
violate the law.
These amps are not type accepted for Ham radio, are not type accepted for
commercial or military use, and if they were they could not be legally sold
to non-licensees.
What does a CBer need with a 100,000 watt amp that is 99,990 watts above
legal?
We are assuredly teaching anarchy when laws are not enforced.
They may be clever, but they are dancing at the edge of criminality like
the President ...
IMHO ... 73, DavidC  AA1FA

----------
> From: craig <bearl@ozemail.com.au>
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: [AMPS] mobile 3cx3000s
To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Date: Tuesday, August 25, 1998 6:29 AM
> 
> 
> For Students of QRO please checkout
> 
> www.geocities.com/researchtriangle/thinktank/1855/
> 
> www.conninc.com-davemade-firdemon.gif
> 
> 
> I thinks these blokes might have us hams beat in the mobile qro stakes, I
> think the doubters from the previous postings on high power cb might now
be
> convinced once they see some of this gear. All we got to do is come
> up with an improved IMD version of these setups for the ham bands.
> 
> 
> Craig
> 
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
> 

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>