>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rich Measures [SMTP:measures@vc.net]
>Sent: Saturday, August 29, 1998 5:32 AM
>To: 'amps@contesting.com'
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] Cathode input networks resonant or not?
>
>
>
>>>I submit - admittedly without PhD-level academic documentation but based
>on
>>>hands-on experience - that if the cathode network isn't resonant AT OR
>>>FAIRLY NEAR the operating frequency there's no "flywheel."
>
>>>......
>>the hands-on measured frequency of resonance of a pi-network (2
>>pi-networks in series)
(should have read two L-networks in series)
>>is near the operating frequency, however, the two
>>frequencies are not the same.
>
>>Rich...
>Presumably you "hands-on" MEASURED the resonant frequency with the amp
>turned OFF, or at least with tubes biased to cutoff. In either case the
>tubes look basically like a capacitance across the output of the input
>pi-net.
>
>Presumably also, you'd ADJUSTED the pi-net WITH DRIVE so that the tubes
>looked more or less like a capacitance (which probably varies a bit over
>the cycle) in parallel with a highly nonlinear resistance.
>
>That (nonlinear) resistance is across only part of the total pi-net
>capacitance which determines resonance. I think a simple experiment will
>show that the "dip" frequency of a pi is somewhat dependent upon the
>terminating load R. That's what I seem to recall theory predicts. Maybe
>it's no mystery!
>
It may be more accurate to say that the wider the Zin/Zout ratio of a
pi-network, the closer the near resonance dip is to the operating
frequency. In an 80m, Q=10, 2k-ohm to 50-ohm pi-net. tank, as I recall,
the observed dip was several hundred kHz below the operating frequency.
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|