>
>
>
>On Sat, 19 Dec 1998 13:55:16 -0800 Rich Measures <measures@vc.net>
>writes:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sat, 19 Dec 1998 07:47:30 -0800 Rich Measures <measures@vc.net>
>>>writes:
>>>>>Since you believe what is published Rich ( when it is convenient )
>>>>how
>>>>>come you cant agree with published Eimac results?
>>>>
>>>>? Eimac said that linearity improved when the anode supply voltage
>>>>was decreased from 2000v to 1500v?
>>>
>>>Yes, thats what several of us have said the past few days.... Its
>>>rightin the full spec sheet.
>>>
>> In one test the ZSAC is 0.133A. In the other test, the ZSAC is
>>0.07A.
>So obviously you had the info in front of you before you asked the
>question Rich.
? I saw no info saying that increasing anode supply and screen supply
potentials increased IMD.
>So instead of wasting my and the reflectors time with
>word games try spitting it all out at once.
>I have no problem increasing I idle to any level at 2KV if it will make
>an improvement in IMD. So what do YOU suggest? ....
? That increasing the anode supply potential does not cause more
distortion. . That reducing ZSAC typically does. . That to realise
maximal power out of a tetrode or pentode in Class AB1 ssb service, one
needs high levels of screen and anode potentials. That the ZSAC and
loading should be adjusted to produce acceptable linearity. And that
the constant-curves are the real story.
- cheers, Carl.
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|