Which is why I changed the subject to "Anode Load Line Calculations"
John ZS5JF
----------
> From: Rich Measures <measures@vc.net>
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [AMPS] Message subjects again
To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Date: 22 December 1998 10:36
>
>
> >Rich,
> >
> >The original message was looking for a tuning capacitor.
>
> ? That was 1/3 of it. There were two more parts.
>
> >Somehow it turned
> >into a discussion about your 2M pair of 4CX250's and whether or not you
> >would create an obnoxious signal at 1000W output.
>
> ? The tuning capacitor part of Wayne's post did not turn into an
> amplifier discussion. The amplifier part of the post turned into an
> amplifier discussion. . . Apparently you did not read the last two
> items on the original post or my quote of it. One more time. The
> original post:
> - - "i'm looking for a tuning capacitor 350pF,2kV working voltage.
> Johnson 154-2 or something equivalent
>
> also looking for for some ceramic insulators
> Johnson 135 series or equivalent
>
> and last ,i'm looking for a high power amp
> for 2 meter ssb ( 500 + out put) any body
> want to sell one? want it ready to plug and play. (am6154 ?)
> please send price and condition.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> wayne"
> ----------------------
>
> >Which turned into a
> >description about how you tune it up. Then G3SEK (I think) griped about
> >how the Europeans overdrive their contesting amps on VHF. Somewhere in
> >there was a couple more topics, the most recent being about input SWR to
an
> >amp.
> >
> >My problem is that all of this is still under the title of looking for a
> >tuning capacitor. The participants in this ongoing discussion simply
hit
> >REPLY each time, meanwhile the subject wanders back and forth. To the
> >people participating, this means nothing because they don't care. The
rest
> >of us on the reflector are inconvenienced because we don't know whether
to
> >read the message or not.
>
> >This pisses people off. Each time raised this issue I gotten e-mails
> >supporting my point. Other people don't like it too.
>
> ? Perhaps some Midol would help?
> >
> >This reflector is not just for the convenience of a few people. If you
> >want to communicate that way, fine - do it off the reflector.
>
> ? So your complaint has nothing to do with the message of Wayne's post.
> Your complaint is about Wanye's Subject line only mentioning two of the
> three topics in the message of his post. Apparently, all would be
> well if the Subject line had said: "tuning capacitor & insulator & 2m
> SSB amp." instead of "tuning capacitor & insulator"?
> >
> - later, Dave
>
>
> Rich...
>
> R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
> Submissions: amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|