>>the filters. Marv sited high insertion loss at 29 MHZ amongst other
>>things.
>
>Hmmmm. I mentioned experiences that Marv then commented on, guess you
>forgot me...
>
>Let me repeat that after a very early problem I have been 100% happy with
>ICE products
>
>73 Carl KM1H
>
I think you're right Carl. I think I got 7 e-mails about ICE filters.
Rather than recite all comments in those e-mails, I chose to just
"summarise" the general gist of them in this most recent post. Marv and I
were back and forth a few times about this subject 'off-line', so his
comments ended-up sticking with me. Now I must admit that I did forget
that you had stated that you were happy with more recent ICE products...my
apologies. I'm perhaps a good example of what happens when an issue like
this comes up - after some time passes, I remember all the NEGATIVE stuff
quite well.
The only reason I followed this up is to get a more complete picture of the
issue. The ICE units appear to be robust well made units, and they are a
reasonable price. It would be a shame to overlook using a product because
of negative impressions that aren't fully justified.
Thanks
Phil
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|