Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Henry Radio Reflector (new)

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Henry Radio Reflector (new)
From: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 16:21:58 -0500


On Tue, 29 Dec 1998 11:22:22 -0800 "Jim" <jdc@ieway.com> writes:
>Here Here!!
>
>To bad Carl is a little one sided....
>
>73!
>
>Jim W7RY


Actually I'm no sided, I work on anything that comes into the shop since
it pays the bills.  And I even try to help those with old Henry amps (
with no expectation they will ship the boatanchor to me) that get told to
screw off  "we no longer support that model" by the owners or their reps.

Other than that I'm just a wee bit curious at the blatant favoritism. Is
that an unrealistic attitude?


73  Carl  KM1H


>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Larry L. Ravlin <sheepdip@continet.com>
>To: km1h@juno.com <km1h@juno.com>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Date: Tuesday, December 29, 1998 12:14 PM
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] Henry Radio Reflector (new)
>
>
>>
>>Who should care if Henry has its own reflector?  And what possible 
>harm
>>could come from it?  The last time I looked the Stars and Bars were 
>still
>>waving and if every amp supplier wanted space on the internet I am 
>sure it
>>would handle it.
>>
>>Larry K0AEY
>>
>>----------
>>> From: km1h@juno.com
>>> To: amps@contesting.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AMPS] Henry Radio Reflector (new)
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>>> Date: Tuesday, December 29, 1998 10:32 AM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 29 Dec 1998 11:11:07 -0500 Jim Reisert AD1C
>>> <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>>> >
>>> >A new reflector is running on contesting.com for discussions 
>about
>>> >Henry
>>> >Radio (and amplifiers of course).
>>>
>>> They need all the help they can get I guess if a dedicated 
>Contesting.com
>>> reflector is needed for a minor player ( in total qty of ham legal 
>amps
>>> sold).
>>> Lets see, Alpha has been the prime choice amp of contesters since 
>the
>>> 70's, Heath outsold all others combined, Amp Supply/Dentron sold
>>> thousands. Are we due for a blatantly commercial reflector to 
>support
>>> those also? Plus all the other current production players?
>>>
>>> Sounds like pure politics to this ole boy Jim but if there is not
>>> constant cross-posting between two competing amp related reflectors 
>I
>>> guess it is OK  (-:
>>>
>>> Be a shame to see some of the "old Sparky" lovers leave.
>>>
>>> 73  Carl  KM1H
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>___________________________________________________________________
>>> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
>>> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at 
>http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
>>> or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>>>
>>> --
>>> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
>>> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>>> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>>> Search:                   
>http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>>
>>--
>>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
>>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>>
>
>

___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>