Remember what a great technical publication "Ham Radio" was !!!
To bad its gone...
73 to all
Jim W7RY
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Measures <measures@vc.net>
To: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Tuesday, January 26, 1999 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: [AMPS] ARRL
>
>
>
>>
>>In a message dated 1/26/99 3:42:34 PM Eastern Standard Time,
mgilmer@gnlp.com
>>writes:
>>
>><< The technical and competitive
>> aspects of amateur radio must now be addressed in separate magazines
>> (both QST and CQ have these sister magazines). Perhaps this is good as
>> it allows more comprehensive coverage of the topics, but is perhaps
>> equally due to the less technical nature of the organizations in general
>> which coincides with the dumbing-down of Americans.
>> >>
>>
>>I think that fractionating publications is detrimental to the whole cause.
>
>? I heard that QEX was Rinaldo's idea to squeeze more money.
>
>- later, Yuri.
>
>
>Rich...
>
>R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|