Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" subm

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all
From: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 99 14:45:26 -0600
>Yeah, a rather interesting one to me. If you are running CW--unless you are
>trying to bounce off the moon--you don't need a linear running 1500++++
>watts--a decent antenna and 100 watts will do just fine. I like SSB and 
>lots of
>power.

Gees, the virtue of CW.  Here is a man who has regaled it and just now 
states a virtue or it!  It can EFFECTIVELY communicate with much less 
power than is required for phone.  I thought you said it was inefficient? 
 Another contradiction........

73,

Jon
KE9NA


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Ogden

jono@enteract.com
www.qsl.net/ke9na

"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>